Prime-boost immunization regimens have proven efficacious at generating robust immune responses. However, whether the level of replication of the boosting antigen impacts the magnitude and protective efficacy of vaccine-elicited immune responses remains unclear. To evaluate this, we primed mice with replication-defective adenovirus vectors expressing the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) glycoprotein (GP), followed by boosting with either LCMV Armstrong, which is rapidly controlled, or LCMV CL-13, which leads to a more prolonged exposure to the boosting antigen. Although priming of naive mice with LCMV CL-13 normally results in T cell exhaustion and establishment of chronic infection, boosting with CL-13 resulted in potent recall CD8 T cell responses that were greater than those following boosting with LCMV Armstrong. Furthermore, following the CL-13 boost, a greater number of anamnestic CD8 T cells localized to the lymph nodes, exhibited granzyme B expression, and conferred improved protection against Listeria and vaccinia virus challenges compared with the Armstrong boost. Overall, our findings suggest that the replicative capacity of the boosting antigen influences the protective efficacy afforded by prime-boost vaccine regimens. These findings are relevant for optimizing vaccine candidates and suggest a benefit of robustly replicating vaccine vectors.
IMPORTANCEThe development of optimal prime-boost vaccine regimens is a high priority for the vaccine development field. In this study, we compared two boosting antigens with different replicative capacities. Boosting with a more highly replicative vector resulted in augmented immune responses and improved protective efficacy.A major challenge in the development of T cell-based vaccines is the generation of CD8 T cell responses of sufficient quantity and quality. Following immunization, cytotoxic CD8 T cells undergo extensive division and differentiation into long-lived memory cells. The number and function of antigen-specific T cells are influenced by several factors, including the route of antigen delivery (1), distinct triggering of innate responses (2-4), the degree of costimulation (5-10), the prime-boost time interval (11,12), the level of preexisting immunity to the vaccine vector (13-15), and the recall history of responding T cells (16)(17)(18). Although the magnitude and duration of the priming stimulus have been shown to impact the function, numbers, and differentiation of CD8 T cells (1,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), it is currently not known how the nature of the boosting stimulus influences anamnestic responses and immune protection by memory CD8 T cells.Alternative serotype adenovirus (Ad) vectors, such as adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) and Ad35, have been shown to induce functionally improved memory T cell responses than that induced by Ad5 (11,28). We have also demonstrated the protective efficacy of vaccine regimens based on alternative serotype Ad vectors against high-dose intravenous (i.v.) and repetitive low-dose intrarecta...