2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-012-0279-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M_DCB: Matlab code for estimating GNSS satellite and receiver differential code biases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, denote the integer phase ambiguities, and, λ 1 , λ 2 are the wavelengths that correspond to ƒ 1 and ƒ 2 frequencies, respectively (Komjathy 1997;Liao 2000;Leick 2004;Dach et al 2007;Jin et al 2012).…”
Section: Obtaining Tec Data From Gnss Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where, denote the integer phase ambiguities, and, λ 1 , λ 2 are the wavelengths that correspond to ƒ 1 and ƒ 2 frequencies, respectively (Komjathy 1997;Liao 2000;Leick 2004;Dach et al 2007;Jin et al 2012).…”
Section: Obtaining Tec Data From Gnss Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Φ 4 data are usually fitted to the P 4 to smooth the P 4 observations by taking advantage of less noisy carrier-phase measurements. Several fitting algorithms have been proposed in the literature (Lanyi and Roth 1988;Jakowski et al 1996;Komjathy and Langley 1996;Otsuka et al 2002;Jin et al 2012). Leveling or fitting of Φ 4 to P 4 is usually achieved by defining a constant offset for each continuous arc of phase measurement as follows:…”
Section: Obtaining Tec Data From Gnss Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As claimed in Section 2, the t IFB could also be calculated, so in Table 4 one day's mean receiver hardware delay deviations at each station are listed in the second column named Method One. In order to check the estimates, the t IFB of each station is also computed by the method put forward by Jin which is based on the least squares method (Jin et al, 2012) and is listed in the third column named Method Two. The two estimates show good agreement with a mean difference of less than 0·5 ns.…”
Section: P E R Fo R M a N C E A N A Ly S I S O F I O N O S P H E R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past studies on BeiDou, the investigation mainly focused on satellite visibility, validity of measurements, carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N 0 ), code noise and positioning results analysis. [4][5][6][7][8] Extensive research has also been conducted on position dilution of precision (PDOP). [9][10][11][12][13] Multipath error seriously affects the precision in high-precision GPS applications, and some articles have analyzed multipath error and detection methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%