2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

m7GPredictor: An improved machine learning-based model for predicting internal m7G modifications using sequence properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It used SVM and m7GFinder [66] , a feature extraction approach based on likelihood ratio (LR), reaching an accuracy of 76% on an independent dataset obtained using three approaches (m7G-Seq, m7G-MeRIP-Seq, and m7G-miCLIP-Seq) [67] . m7GPredictor [68] is another SVM based approach that combined NP, K-mer, PseDNC, Ksnpf, and PseKNC features to reach an accuracy of 86%. XG-m7G [29] is a technique that uses the XGboost algorithm along with multiple features (ND, NCP, ENAC, CKSNAP), followed by SHAP (Shapley additive interpretations) to predict the modification sites.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches For Rna Modification Sites Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It used SVM and m7GFinder [66] , a feature extraction approach based on likelihood ratio (LR), reaching an accuracy of 76% on an independent dataset obtained using three approaches (m7G-Seq, m7G-MeRIP-Seq, and m7G-miCLIP-Seq) [67] . m7GPredictor [68] is another SVM based approach that combined NP, K-mer, PseDNC, Ksnpf, and PseKNC features to reach an accuracy of 86%. XG-m7G [29] is a technique that uses the XGboost algorithm along with multiple features (ND, NCP, ENAC, CKSNAP), followed by SHAP (Shapley additive interpretations) to predict the modification sites.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches For Rna Modification Sites Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Predictor ML- Algorithm Features Testing NS WS Sn Sp ACC ROC Link iRNA-m7G [12] SVM NPF,SSC, PseDNC 10-fold cross validation 1482 41 bp 88.66% 90.96% 89.81% 94.6% http://lin-group.cn/server/iRNA-m7G/ XG-m7G [29] XGBoost CKS-P, E-C, NCP,ND 10-fold cross validation 1482 41 bp 91.48% 90.96% 91.22% 97.2% - m7g model [66] SVM One hot, NCP, NC, k-mer, PseKNC 10-fold cross validation 1482 41 bp 95.11% 93.74% 94.67% 98.2% https://github.com/MapFM/m7g_model m7GHub [27] SVM Sequence and genome derived features. Independent test - 30 bp 84.20% 71.00% 76.00% 85.5% - m7GPredictor [68] SVM NP, K-mer, PseDNC, Ksnpf, PseKNC Independent test 300 50 bp 84.00% 88.00% 86.00% 93.3% https://github.com/NWAFU-LiuLab/m7Gpredictor …”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches For Rna Modification Sites Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, computational methods have been proposed as alternative approaches. A series of bioinformatics tools using machine learning algorithms for predicting m6A ( Wei Chen et al, 2015 ; Zhou et al, 2016 ; Huang et al, 2018 ; Kunqi Chen et al, 2019 ; Zou et al, 2019 ), m5C ( Qiu et al, 2017 ; Sabooh et al, 2018 ; Akbar et al, 2020 ; Dou et al, 2020 ), m7G ( Wei Chen et al, 2019 , 7; Liu X. et al, 2020 ; Yang et al, 2020 ; Dai et al, 2021 ), and many others have been developed. A recent review article has elaborated on the differences between these studies, in the aspect of benchmarking datasets, feature encoding schemes, and the main algorithms ( Chen et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zhao et al, the internal mRNA m7G methyltransferase METTL1, and not WDR4, is a key responder to post-ischemic insults, resulting in a global reduction in m7G methylation inside mRNA [8]. In addition, Liu et al introduced m7GPredictor for predicting internal m7G modification sites using sequence properties [9]. In this model, the authors used various numerical descriptor methods and a random forest was used for the selection of optimal feature sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%