2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

m6AmPred: Identifying RNA N6, 2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am) sites based on sequence-derived information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step of functional epitranscriptome prediction is to identify modification sites, either directly from high-throughput sequencing data or by using sequenced-based computational prediction tools. There exist a large number of sequencing technologies and software tools that can serve this purpose, including but not limited to those based on reverse transcription signature [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , bisulfite treatment [39] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] , antibody [11] , [12] and the primary sequences of RNA molecules [67] , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [75] , [76] , [77] , [78] , [79] , [80] , [81] , [82] , [83] , [84] . In the following paragraph, we cover primarily two most widely used approaches, including site detection from MeRIP-Seq data and sequence-based in silico prediction methods.…”
Section: Identification Of Rna Modification Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step of functional epitranscriptome prediction is to identify modification sites, either directly from high-throughput sequencing data or by using sequenced-based computational prediction tools. There exist a large number of sequencing technologies and software tools that can serve this purpose, including but not limited to those based on reverse transcription signature [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , bisulfite treatment [39] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] , antibody [11] , [12] and the primary sequences of RNA molecules [67] , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [75] , [76] , [77] , [78] , [79] , [80] , [81] , [82] , [83] , [84] . In the following paragraph, we cover primarily two most widely used approaches, including site detection from MeRIP-Seq data and sequence-based in silico prediction methods.…”
Section: Identification Of Rna Modification Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a number of computational approaches have been proposed for in silico prediction of RNA modification sites from the primary RNA sequences, including: the iRNA toolkits [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] , SRAMP 12 , DeepPromise 13 , WHISTLE 14 , Gene2vec 15 , m6A-Atlas 16 , RMDisease 17 , PEA 18 , PPUS 19 , BERMP 20 , m5Upred 21 , and m6AmPred 22 . Special attention has also been paid to the prediction of RNA modifications in introns 23 , lncRNAs 24 as well as various tissues and cell lines [25][26][27] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Jiang et al (2022) presented the m6AmPred, the first web server, for in silico identification of m6Am sites from the primary sequences of RNA. m6AmPred was built upon the XgbDart (eXtreme Gradient Boosting with Dart algorithm) and EIIP-PseEIIP encoding scheme.…”
Section: Methods To Detect Rna Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%