GnRH and its analogs are used extensively for the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases and assisted reproductive techniques. They also have potential as novel contraceptives in men and women. A thorough delineation of the molecular mechanisms involved in ligand binding, receptor activation, and intracellular signal transduction is kernel to understanding disease processes and the development of specific interventions. Twenty-three structural variants of GnRH have been identified in protochordates and vertebrates. In many vertebrates, three GnRHs and three cognate receptors have been identified with distinct distributions and functions. In man, the hypothalamic GnRH regulates gonadotropin secretion through the pituitary GnRH type I receptor via activation of G(q). In-depth studies have identified amino acid residues in both the ligand and receptor involved in binding, receptor activation, and translation into intracellular signal transduction. Although the predominant coupling of the type I GnRH receptor in the gonadotrope is through productive G(q) stimulation, signal transduction can occur via other G proteins and potentially by G protein-independent means. The eventual selection of intracellular signaling may be specifically directed by variations in ligand structure. A second form of GnRH, GnRH II, conserved in all higher vertebrates, including man, is present in extrahypothalamic brain and many reproductive tissues. Its cognate receptor has been cloned from various vertebrate species, including New and Old World primates. The human gene homolog of this receptor, however, has a frame-shift and stop codon, and it appears that GnRH II signaling occurs through the type I GnRH receptor. There has been considerable plasticity in the use of different GnRHs, receptors, and signaling pathways for diverse functions. Delineation of the structural elements in GnRH and the receptor, which facilitate differential signaling, will contribute to the development of novel interventive GnRH analogs.

Despite the prevalent studies of DNA/Chromatin related epigenetics, such as, histone modifications and DNA methylation, RNA epigenetics has not drawn deserved attention until a new affinity-based sequencing approach MeRIP-Seq was developed and applied to survey the global mRNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in mammalian cells. As a marriage of ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq, MeRIP-Seq has the potential to study the transcriptome-wide distribution of various post-transcriptional RNA modifications. We have previously developed an R/Bioconductor package ‘exomePeak’ for detecting RNA methylation sites under a specific experimental condition or the identifying the differential RNA methylation sites in a case control study from MeRIP-Seq data. Compared with other relatively well studied data types such as ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq, the study of MeRIP-Seq data is still at very early stage, and existing protocols are not optimized for dealing with the intrinsic characteristic of MeRIP-Seq data. We therein provide here a detailed and easy-to-use protocol of using exomePeak R/Bioconductor package along with other software programs for analysis of MeRIP-Seq data, which covers raw reads alignment, RNA methylation site detection, motif discovery, differential RNA methylation analysis, and functional analysis. Particularly, the rationales behind each processing step as well as the specific method used, the best practice, and possible alternative strategies are briefly discussed.

N 6-Methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent RNA modification on mRNAs and lncRNAs. It plays a pivotal role during various biological processes and disease pathogenesis. We present here a comprehensive knowledgebase, m6A-Atlas, for unraveling the m6A epitranscriptome. Compared to existing databases, m6A-Atlas features a high-confidence collection of 442 162 reliable m6A sites identified from seven base-resolution technologies and the quantitative (rather than binary) epitranscriptome profiles estimated from 1363 high-throughput sequencing samples. It also offers novel features, such as; the conservation of m6A sites among seven vertebrate species (including human, mouse and chimp), the m6A epitranscriptomes of 10 virus species (including HIV, KSHV and DENV), the putative biological functions of individual m6A sites predicted from epitranscriptome data, and the potential pathogenesis of m6A sites inferred from disease-associated genetic mutations that can directly destroy m6A directing sequence motifs. A user-friendly graphical user interface was constructed to support the query, visualization and sharing of the m6A epitranscriptomes annotated with sites specifying their interaction with post-transcriptional machinery (RBP-binding, microRNA interaction and splicing sites) and interactively display the landscape of multiple RNA modifications. These resources provide fresh opportunities for unraveling the m6A epitranscriptomes. m6A-Atlas is freely accessible at: www.xjtlu.edu.cn/biologicalsciences/atlas.

No abstract

N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) is the most prevalent post-transcriptional modification in eukaryotes, and plays a pivotal role in various biological processes, such as splicing, RNA degradation and RNA–protein interaction. We report here a prediction framework WHISTLE for transcriptome-wide m 6 A RNA-methylation site prediction. When tested on six independent datasets, our approach, which integrated 35 additional genomic features besides the conventional sequence features, achieved a major improvement in the accuracy of m 6 A site prediction (average AUC: 0.948 and 0.880 under the full transcript or mature messenger RNA models, respectively) compared to the state-of-the-art computational approaches MethyRNA (AUC: 0.790 and 0.732) and SRAMP (AUC: 0.761 and 0.706). It also out-performed the existing epitranscriptome databases MeT-DB (AUC: 0.798 and 0.744) and RMBase (AUC: 0.786 and 0.736), which were built upon hundreds of epitranscriptome high-throughput sequencing samples. To probe the putative biological processes impacted by changes in an individual m 6 A site, a network-based approach was implemented according to the ‘guilt-by-association’ principle by integrating RNA methylation profiles, gene expression profiles and protein–protein interaction data. Finally, the WHISTLE web server was built to facilitate the query of our high-accuracy map of the human m 6 A epitranscriptome, and the server is freely available at: www.xjtlu.edu.cn/biologicalsciences/whistle and http://whistle-epitranscriptome.com .

Activation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors requires agonist binding followed by a conformational change, but the ligand binding and conformationswitching residues have not been completely identified. Systematic alanine-scanning mutagenesis has been used to assess residues 142-164 in transmembrane helix 4 and 402-421 in transmembrane helix 7 of the M 1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Several inward-facing amino acid side chains in the exofacial parts of transmembrane helices 4 and 7 contribute to acetylcholine binding. Alanine substitution of the aromatic residues in this group reduced signaling efficacy, suggesting that they may form part of a charge-stabilized aromatic cage, which triggers rotation and movement of the transmembrane helices. The mutation of adjacent residues modulated receptor activation, either reducing signaling or causing constitutive activation. In the buried endofacial section of transmembrane helix 7, alanine substitution mutants of the conserved NSXXNPXXY motif displayed strongly reduced signaling efficacy, despite having increased or unchanged acetylcholine affinity. These residues may have dual functions, forming intramolecular contacts that stabilize the receptor in the inactive ground state, but that are broken, allowing them to form new intramolecular bonds in the activated state. This conformational rearrangement is critical to produce a G protein binding site and may represent a key mechanism of receptor activation. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs)1 belong to the rhodopsin-like family of 7-transmembrane (7-TM) receptors. Agonists bind to these receptors at the extracellular end. This leads to the binding and activation of a G protein at the intracellular face. These receptors are characterized by the possession of a particular set of evolutionarily conserved amino acids, mostly located in the 7-TM helices, implying that they may share a common mechanism of activation. However, the topography of the binding pockets and the conformational changes related to agonist-induced receptor activation are incompletely understood. In recent studies on the M 1 mAChR, we have identified ligand contact residues in TM 3 (1), 5 (2), and 6 (3) and inferred a strip of residues in TM 3 contributing to the activated state of the M 1 mAChR by using alanine-scanning mutagenesis, or cysteine-scanning mutagenesis. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the ground state of rhodopsin at 2.8 Å (4) has provided a framework for modeling the mAChRs and allowed us to interpret most of the information obtained by mutagenesis studies on the M 1 mAChR.In the initial projection map of rhodopsin (5), TM 4 appeared as an outlier of the helical bundle, with a large lipid-exposed surface and few polar residues. Consequently, its function has received little attention. However, a recent photo-activated chromophore cross-linking study of rhodopsin has shown a flip-over of the ionone ring from the neighborhood of TM 6 to TM 4 during receptor activation, implying that a substantial movement of TM ...

An Asp-Arg-Tyr triad occurs in a majority of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors. The fully conserved Arg is critical for G protein activation, but the function of the flanking residues is not well understood. We expressed in COS-7 cells m1 muscarinic receptors that were mutated at Asp122 and Tyr124. Most mutations at either position strongly attenuated or prevented the expression of binding sites for the antagonist [3H]N-methylscopolamine. However, sites that were expressed displayed unaltered affinity for the antagonist. Receptor protein, visualized with a carboxyl-terminally directed antibody, was reduced but never completely abolished. The effects of these mutations were partially reversed by the deletion of 129 amino acids from the third intracellular loop of the receptor. In several cases, comparison of immunocytochemistry with binding measurements suggested the presence of substantial amounts of inactive, presumably misfolded, receptor protein. Some of the variants that bound [3H]N-methylscopolamine underwent small changes in their affinities for acetylcholine. All retained nearly normal abilities to mediate an acetylcholine-induced phosphoinositide response. We propose that Asp122 and Tyr124 make intramolecular contacts whose integrity is important for efficient receptor folding but that they do not participate directly in signaling. The role of these residues is completely distinct from that of Arg123, whose mutation abolishes signaling without diminishing receptor expression.

The results demonstrate the ␣-helical secondary structure of the domain and suggest its orientation with respect to the other transmembrane domains. The C-terminal part of the helix appears to be largely buried within the receptor structure. On its surface, there is a patch of three residues, Val 113 , Leu 116 , and Ser 120 , which may form intramolecular contacts that help to stabilize the inactive ground state of the receptor. Mutagenic disruption of these increased agonist affinity and signaling efficacy. In two cases (L116A and S120A), this led to constitutive activation of the receptor. Parallel to the helix axis and spanning the whole transmembrane region, a distinct strip of residues on one face of transmembrane domain 3 forms intermolecular (acetylcholine-receptor, receptor-G protein) or intrareceptor bonds that contribute to the activated state. The binding of acetylcholine may destabilize the first set of contacts while favoring the formation of the second.