2008
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65391-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lysobacter spongiicola sp. nov., isolated from a deep-sea sponge

Abstract: An aerobic, Gram-negative bacterium, strain KMM 329 T , was isolated from a deep-sea sponge specimen from the Philippine Sea and subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic investigation. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain KMM 329 T clustered with the species of the genus Lysobacter. The highest level of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (97.0 %) was found with respect to Lysobacter concretionis KCTC 12205 T ; lower values (96.4-95.2 %) were obtained with respect to the other recognized Lys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major cellular fatty acids of strain 2-5 T were iso-C 16: 0 (15.1%), iso-C 15: 0 (14.4%), iso-C 17: 1 ω9c (9.9%), iso-C 11: 0 3-OH (8.4%) and iso-C 11: 0 (7.7%) ( Table 2). The presence of branched fatty acids, namely iso-C 16:0 , iso-C 15: 0 , iso-C 17:1 ω19c and iso-C 17: 0 , was consistent with the placement of strain 2-5 T within the genus Lysobacter (Bae et al, 2005;Weon et al, 2006Weon et al, , 2007Romanenko et al, 2008). However, strain 2-5 T contained C 16:0 ω7c/16:1 ω6c and C 19:0 cyclo ω8c, which differences with the reference strains.…”
Section: Morphological and Physiological Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The major cellular fatty acids of strain 2-5 T were iso-C 16: 0 (15.1%), iso-C 15: 0 (14.4%), iso-C 17: 1 ω9c (9.9%), iso-C 11: 0 3-OH (8.4%) and iso-C 11: 0 (7.7%) ( Table 2). The presence of branched fatty acids, namely iso-C 16:0 , iso-C 15: 0 , iso-C 17:1 ω19c and iso-C 17: 0 , was consistent with the placement of strain 2-5 T within the genus Lysobacter (Bae et al, 2005;Weon et al, 2006Weon et al, , 2007Romanenko et al, 2008). However, strain 2-5 T contained C 16:0 ω7c/16:1 ω6c and C 19:0 cyclo ω8c, which differences with the reference strains.…”
Section: Morphological and Physiological Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similar studies have led to the isolation of novel bacterial genera and species from other phyla also. Novel α-Proteobacteria [22], γ-Proteobacteria [8,21,36,37], Bacteroidetes [17][18][19][20] and Verrucomicrobia [39,59] have all been cultured from sponge tissues. There is growing evidence that monophyletic bacterial lineages have co-evolved with their sponge hosts to form sponge-specific clades which are more similar to each other than to similar taxa from non-sponge sources [24,47,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential phenotypic characteristics of strain Dae08 T and recognized Lysobacter species Taxa: 1, strain Dae08 T (present study); 2, L. brunescens ATCC 29482 T [data in columns 2, 3, 5, 8, and 14 are from Christensen and Cook (1978) and Weon et al (2007)]; 3, L. gummosus ATCC 29489 T ; 4, L. daejeonensis KACC 11406 T (Weon et al, 2006); 5, L. antibioticus DSM 2044 T ; 6, L. capsici KCTC 22007 T (Park et al, 2008); 7, L. niastensis DSM 18481 T ; 8, L. enzymogenes DSM 2043 T ; 9, L. concretionis DSM 16239 T (Bae et al, 2005); 10, L. spongiicola JCM 14760 T (Romanenko et al, 2007); 11, L. yangpyeongensis KACC 11407 T ; 12, L. koreensis KCTC 12204 T ; 13, L. defluvii DSM 18482 T (Yassin et al, 2007); 14, L. niabensis DSM 18244 T (Weon et al, 2007). +, Positive; (+), weakly positive; -, negative; ND, no data available.…”
Section: J Microbiolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bacteria with high G+C content, and at present comprises thirteen species with validly published names, namely Lysobacter antibioticus (Christensen and Cook, 1978), Lysobacter brunescens (Christensen and Cook, 1978), Lysobacter capsici (Park et al, 2008), Lysobacter concretionis (Bae et al, 2005), Lysobacter daejeonensis (Weon et al, 2006), Lysobacter defluvii (Yassin et al, 2007), Lysobacter enzymogenes (Christensen and Cook, 1978), Lysobacter gummosus (Christensen and Cook, 1978), Lysobacter koreensis , Lysobacter niabensis (Weon et al, 2007), Lysobacter niastensis (Weon et al, 2007), Lysobacter spongiicola (Romanenko et al, 2007), and Lysobacter yangpyeongensis (Weon et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%