2017
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201707630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lysine‐Targeting Covalent Inhibitors

Abstract: Targeted covalent inhibitors have gained widespread attention in drug discovery as a validated method to circumvent acquired resistance in oncology. This strategy exploits small-molecule/protein crystal structures to design tightly binding ligands with appropriately positioned electrophilic warheads. Whilst most focus has been on targeting binding-site cysteine residues, targeting nucleophilic lysine residues can also represent a viable approach to irreversible inhibition. However, owing to the basicity of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
188
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(195 reference statements)
0
188
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[264] Therefore, the design of targeted covalent modifiers relies on the use of "warheads" with well-balanced reactivity,w hich is revealed only in close proximity to the targetb inding center after appropriate positioning of the ligand provided by noncovalent interactions. [253,264,265] Because typical covalenti nhibitors address nucleophilic side chains of cysteineo rserine/threonine (less common cases include reactions with lysine, [266] histidine, methionine, or tyrosine residues [253] ), the list of most populari rreversible covalent warheadsi ncludes electrophilicm oieties, [253,261] such as Michael acceptors (a,b-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, acrylamides, vinyl sulfones, vinyl sulfonamides,e tc. ), compounds capable of formingS ÀSbonds (e.g.,thiols), sulfonyl fluorides, [267] epoxides, b-lactones and b-lactams, and alkylating agents.…”
Section: Covalent Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[264] Therefore, the design of targeted covalent modifiers relies on the use of "warheads" with well-balanced reactivity,w hich is revealed only in close proximity to the targetb inding center after appropriate positioning of the ligand provided by noncovalent interactions. [253,264,265] Because typical covalenti nhibitors address nucleophilic side chains of cysteineo rserine/threonine (less common cases include reactions with lysine, [266] histidine, methionine, or tyrosine residues [253] ), the list of most populari rreversible covalent warheadsi ncludes electrophilicm oieties, [253,261] such as Michael acceptors (a,b-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, acrylamides, vinyl sulfones, vinyl sulfonamides,e tc. ), compounds capable of formingS ÀSbonds (e.g.,thiols), sulfonyl fluorides, [267] epoxides, b-lactones and b-lactams, and alkylating agents.…”
Section: Covalent Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Aspirin, penicillin, omeprazole, and clopidogrel are examples of successful covalent drugs. [4,5] Imine formation is awell-known reaction of amines and several enzymes take advantage of Schiff base formation with ap yridoxal phosphate (PLP) cofactor. Recently,researchers at AstraZeneca have reported the generation of highly potent inhibitors of induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein (Mcl-1), featuring af ormyl-or an acetyl-phenylboronic acid moiety in the ortho position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysine labeling has been used extensively for bioconjugation and increasingly in the design of covalent inhibitors . Chemoproteomic applications of lysine targeting include the use of sulfo‐N‐hydroxy succinimide (NHS) biotin reagents, which contain the highly reactive NHS ester, to label cell‐surface proteins (cell permeation is deliberately impaired due to the presence of the charged sulfate group; Figure ).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%