plus 15 million persons more.For me, these are sobering if not staggering figures. When against this backdrop one reviews the problem, implications that I have tried to outline as well as others, both economic and noneconomic in character, that might be added, and considers how ill prepared we in this predominantly urban nation are to deal with them intelligently and in time, he may be pardoned if he concludes that this country has a few things to worry about besides the Sputniks. The metropolitan outlook is grave, in my opinion, not because its problems are impregnable, but because our poor preparation for dealing with them is found on so many fronts-in basic understanding of the problems themselves, in governmental and private institutional means for deciding on policies and pressing forward with them, and in public appreciation of the scale and seriousness of the issues.In the lifetimes of most of us, not only the face but also the physique of urban America is going to be changed -radically changed. In my opinion we simply cannot afford to muddle along as we are now doing-building a parking garage here or there, transferring a bankrupt transit company to public ownership, tearing down a few blocks of old houses, hiring another junior planner or two when we can find them, nursing our petty, parochial prejudices, whether in central city or suburb, trying to decide if we should not raise the dog license fee a dollar to keep our local government out of the clutches of that evil foreign octopus that is headquartered in Washington, and tentatively suggesting that maybe it is about time to begin to think about setting up a metropolitan planning body or a special authority responsible for both water supply and sewage disposal. If we continue in this vein, well before 1975 we will have lost one of the finest opportunities any generation of Americans ever had: the opportunity to make our rapidly growing urban localities into things of economy, beauty, and livability, appropriate settings for metropolitan communities that we and our children can live in and take part in with pride.In part I of this article [Science, 129, 1528 (1959) ], an attempt wasmade to discuss the possible sources of error peculiar to biological research in schizophrenia, including the possible heterogeneity of that symptom complex and the presence of certain biological features-such as adventitious disease, nutritional deficiencies, disturbances associated with abnormal motor or emotional states, and changes brought about by treatment, all of which may be said to result from the disease or from its current management rather than to Ibe factors in its genesis. The difficulty of avoiding subjective bias was emphasized. Some of the hypotheses relating to oxygen, carbohydrate, and energy metabolism, to amino acid metabolism, and to epinephrine were presented, and the existing evidence relevant to them was discussed. Among the recent or current concepts there remain to be discussed those concerned with ceruloplasmin, with serotonin, and with the general...