2012
DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymphatic filariasis mapping by Immunochromatographic Test cards and baseline microfilaria survey prior to mass drug administration in Sierra Leone

Abstract: BackgroundNational mapping of lymphatic filariasis (LF) was conducted using Immunochromatographic tests (ICT) in 2005 to determine endemicity and geographic spread of the disease. A baseline microfilaria survey was then conducted to determine LF prevalence and microfilaria intensity.MethodsIn 2005 1,982 persons of 15 years and over from 14 health districts were selected and fingertip blood samples were tested with ICT cards. In 2007-8 blood samples were taken between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. and examined for microfi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the presence of W. bancrofti antigenaemia can be detected using the ICT card test [33][34][35] and presence of specific IgG4 antibodies to Brugia spp can be detected using the Brugia Rapid™ test [36][37][38]. Surveys for the mapping of LF have been based on a variety of sampling designs, including the rapid geographical assessment of Bancroftian filariasis (RAGFIL) method [29,63], lot quality assurance sampling [64,65], population-based household surveys [66] and sentinel site surveys [43,67,68], with the choice of survey methodology dependent on available resources and the stage of the control programme [69].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the presence of W. bancrofti antigenaemia can be detected using the ICT card test [33][34][35] and presence of specific IgG4 antibodies to Brugia spp can be detected using the Brugia Rapid™ test [36][37][38]. Surveys for the mapping of LF have been based on a variety of sampling designs, including the rapid geographical assessment of Bancroftian filariasis (RAGFIL) method [29,63], lot quality assurance sampling [64,65], population-based household surveys [66] and sentinel site surveys [43,67,68], with the choice of survey methodology dependent on available resources and the stage of the control programme [69].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the end of 2012, 59 out of the 72 endemic countries had completed national mapping surveys [39]. The results of these surveys highlight the marked withincountry geographical heterogeneity [26,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. LF mapping is ongoing in the remaining endemic countries except Eritrea, where it has not started yet [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anopheles epiroticus (n = 1469) was the most commonly caught Anopheles species in human bait catches (48%) in both areas and, as in other coastal areas of South-East Asia, is likely to be an important malaria vector in this area [5,11-13]. The Rakhine state is composed of a network of inland seawater rivers and streams and tidal creeks along these rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, Anopheles dirus and Anopheles minimus were identified as the primary vector species complexes, as in many other parts of the country, while Anopheles annularis, Anopheles subpictus, Anopheles epiroticus (previously called Anopheles sundaicus ), Anopheles aconitus, Anopheles hyrcanus, Anopheles culicifacies, Anopheles maculatus , Anopheles varuna, Anopheles jeyporensis, Anopheles sinensis and Anopheles philippinensis have all been identified as secondary vectors [3-5]. In the nearby Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh, Anopheles umbrosus, Anopheles barbirostris, Anopheles nigerrimus , Anopheles nivipes, Anopheles kochi , and Anopheles vagus have also been identified as vectors [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases, additional data needed to be collected for more reliable estimates. The availability of funding determines the ability to undertake surveys [14]. It is hoped that the financial commitments by international partners such as United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Department for International Development (DFID), World Bank, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation following the London Declaration (2012), and the subsequent meeting in Paris (2014) will see major improvements in the funding needs of control programmes [15,16].…”
Section: Programme Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%