The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)42705-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lye injuries of the esophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have not reported in detail the relationships between the findings on physical examination and EGD. Our data are in keeping with the impression that absence of oropharyngeal lesions does not exclude esophageal or gastric mucosal disease (5–7). We had patients with normal findings on oropharyngeal examinations and grade 2 and 3 mucosal injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have not reported in detail the relationships between the findings on physical examination and EGD. Our data are in keeping with the impression that absence of oropharyngeal lesions does not exclude esophageal or gastric mucosal disease (5–7). We had patients with normal findings on oropharyngeal examinations and grade 2 and 3 mucosal injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The indications for EGD in the evaluation of children with caustic ingestions are debated. It is generally agreed that the absence of oropharyngeal lesions does not completely exclude esophageal or gastric mucosal injury (5)(6)(7). Symptoms reported after caustic ingestion include nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, refusal to drink, drooling, abdominal pain, and stridor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors identified only one perforation in index endoscopy in the alkali group. No iatrogenic perforations occurred during endoscopic examinations, although this complication is mentioned in the literature [ 3 , 11 , 12 ]. This finding might be explained by the careful examination with small diameter endoscopes [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%