2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44797-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung stiffness of C57BL/6 versus BALB/c mice

Andrés Rojas-Ruiz,
Magali Boucher,
Rebecka Gill
et al.

Abstract: This study was undertaken to determine whether a smaller lung volume or a stiffer lung tissue accounts for the greater lung elastance of C57BL/6 than BALB/c mice. The mechanical properties of the respiratory system and lung volumes were measured with the flexiVent and compared between male C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 9). The size of the excised lung was also measured by volume liquid displacement. One lobe was then subjected to sinusoidal strains in vitro to directly assess the mechanical properties of the lu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BALB/c mice exhibited a greater airway distensibility than C57BL/6 mice. This is consistent with the stiffer lung of C57BL/6 versus BALB/c mice [ 17 ]. There was also a significant interaction between sex and mouse strain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BALB/c mice exhibited a greater airway distensibility than C57BL/6 mice. This is consistent with the stiffer lung of C57BL/6 versus BALB/c mice [ 17 ]. There was also a significant interaction between sex and mouse strain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The pressure range was different between mouse strains because preliminary results demonstrated that the approximately linear change in Newtonian resistance ( R N ) caused by inflating pressure occurs over a smaller range in BALB/c compared to C57BL/6 mice. This is consistent with the stiffer lung of C57BL/6 compared to BALB/c mice [ 17 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation