2013
DOI: 10.5935/2318-5015.20130030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung function evaluation: comparing fixed percentage reference values vs. the 5th percentile in the diagnosis of airway obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it can increase the rates of false-positive results among older subjects and might not detect the disease in younger subjects (false-negative results). 22 , 23 The increase in the number of false-positive results is minimized when this criterion is based on the fifth percentile or taken as below the LLN. On the other hand, it has already been demonstrated that false-negative results are more common when such a criterion is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it can increase the rates of false-positive results among older subjects and might not detect the disease in younger subjects (false-negative results). 22 , 23 The increase in the number of false-positive results is minimized when this criterion is based on the fifth percentile or taken as below the LLN. On the other hand, it has already been demonstrated that false-negative results are more common when such a criterion is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 , 26 , 27 These diagnostic criteria present different sensitivities, specificities and positive and negative predictive values. 23 , 24 , 28 , 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%