2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcle.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computerised tomography. Thoughts on its use in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lung cancer screening using LDCT is expensive. Even if it is assumed that it is beneficial if the number needed to screen to detect one lung cancer is low, a large amount of resources must be allocated to start and maintain the screening program (15). If screening frequency were to be reduced to a biannual screening, its cost could be reduced approximately by half (excluding infrastructure resources).…”
Section: Biannual Screening Interval and Cost-effectiveness Of Lung Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung cancer screening using LDCT is expensive. Even if it is assumed that it is beneficial if the number needed to screen to detect one lung cancer is low, a large amount of resources must be allocated to start and maintain the screening program (15). If screening frequency were to be reduced to a biannual screening, its cost could be reduced approximately by half (excluding infrastructure resources).…”
Section: Biannual Screening Interval and Cost-effectiveness Of Lung Cmentioning
confidence: 99%