2001
DOI: 10.1002/jso.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer in patients younger than 40 years of age

Abstract: This study suggests that the prognosis of young patients with lung cancer is at least equivalent to that of older patients; therefore, they should be managed according to the general therapeutic guidelines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In our study, the percentage of adenocarcinoma in the young male subgroup was significantly higher than that of the whole group. Although this analysis lacks a detailed smoking history, we think smoking is a major factor for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In our study, the percentage of adenocarcinoma in the young male subgroup was significantly higher than that of the whole group. Although this analysis lacks a detailed smoking history, we think smoking is a major factor for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although several reports have shown no differences in the prognosis of surgically treated cases of lung cancer (Sugio et al 1992;Shimono et al 1994;Schönfeld et al 1999;Maruyama et al 2001;Skarin et al 2001), lung cancer in young adults is reported to be associated with a poor prognosis (Putnam et al 1997) and to be more aggressive (Antkowiak et al 1989;Whooley et al 2000). Furthermore, it has been reported that lung cancer in patients younger than 40 years of age is often more advanced at the time of diagnosis than in elderly patients (Pemberton et al 1983;Schönfeld et al 1999;Maruyama et al 2001;Skarin et al 2001). However, the biological features of lung cancer in young adults have not yet been fully elucidated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…60 years of age or older, and it has been reported that, among lung cancer patients younger than 40 years of age, females are becoming increasingly affected and adenocarcinoma is becoming more common (Pemberton et al 1983;Antkowiak et al 1989;Sugio et al 1992;Shimono et al 1994;Putnam et al 1997;Schönfeld et al 1999;Whooley et al 2000;Maruyama et al 2001;Skarin et al 2001). Although several reports have shown no differences in the prognosis of surgically treated cases of lung cancer (Sugio et al 1992;Shimono et al 1994;Schönfeld et al 1999;Maruyama et al 2001;Skarin et al 2001), lung cancer in young adults is reported to be associated with a poor prognosis (Putnam et al 1997) and to be more aggressive (Antkowiak et al 1989;Whooley et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies concluded that young patients had a longer survival [10,12,13,[15][16][17][18], although the authors sometimes acknowledged that they received more aggressive treatment, others found a shorter survival [19], and many studies did not find any survival difference between young and older patients [9,14,[21][22][23][24]. However, these results cannot be compared because the cut-off used to define young patients varies from 40 to 50 years, and the populations included in these studies are heterogeneous, sometimes limited to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or adenocarcinoma or restricted to patients who underwent surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%