2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.90.059706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luiset al.Reply:

Abstract: Luis et al. Reply: Hansen and Mørup (HM) argue [1] that our interpretation of magnetic relaxation of interacting Co clusters [2] was ''based on unrealistic assumptions'' and suggest an alternative interpretation in terms of collective dynamics. We shall next (a) discuss the validity of our assumptions and (b) argue that the interpretation proposed by HM is not supported by the experiments reported in [2].In our calculations [2], we assume that the magnetic moments of the neighboring particles have time to reac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model predicted that the flipping of magnetic moment slows down with increasing dipole-dipole interaction. The superparamagnetic model with modified energy barrier was quite successful in interpreting experimental observations for different interacting particle systems [17][18][19] and has been recently confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations. 20 Interestingly, Mørup and Tronc 21 proposed a different form of effective energy barrier for the superparamagnetic model and successfully explained their experimental results obtained on weakly interacting ␥-Fe 2 O 3 particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model predicted that the flipping of magnetic moment slows down with increasing dipole-dipole interaction. The superparamagnetic model with modified energy barrier was quite successful in interpreting experimental observations for different interacting particle systems [17][18][19] and has been recently confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations. 20 Interestingly, Mørup and Tronc 21 proposed a different form of effective energy barrier for the superparamagnetic model and successfully explained their experimental results obtained on weakly interacting ␥-Fe 2 O 3 particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…17,[37][38][39][40] Both models are quite successful in describing the memory effect in spin-glass systems. 27 We will not reiterate them here.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the effective conductivity is given as Decomposition 29 and the sample conductivity is obtained from Eq. (6). The result depends obviously of the magnetic configuration, which is used as input to obtain the inter-particle conductivities (Eq.…”
Section: The Model and The Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…frozen ferrofluids [2], discontinuous metal-insulator multilayers (DMIMs) [8,13], co-sputtered metal-insulator films [14], selforganized particle arrays on surfaces [15], focused ionbeam structured thin films [16] and mechanically alloyed materials [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%