1976
DOI: 10.1117/12.954580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Quality Control In Diagnostic Radiology</title>

Abstract: The factors that I consider to be absolute essentials in our quality control program at Mayo Clinic are x -ray generator calibration, sensitometric regulation of film processing, x -ray exposure technique system, and on -line quality control. Other aspects of a complete system such as measurement of x -ray tube focal spot size, radiation output checks, checks on the performance of our image systems, and evaluation of new products are desirable to improve our work; these have been incorporated as they have beco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ESAK value can be used to determine the amount of exposure dose which refers to the national I-DRL value, as stated in the Decree of the Head of BAPETEN No. 1211/K/V/2021 concerning the Determination of Indonesian Diagnostic Reference Level Values for X-ray Ct Scan and General Radiography Modalities (Ratnawati et al, 2019;Winkler, 1976). Where in this decision the ESAK value for Chast PA is 0.4 mGy, so the ESAK value in this study still meets the national I-DRL value (Proost & Meijer, 1992;Bonello et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The ESAK value can be used to determine the amount of exposure dose which refers to the national I-DRL value, as stated in the Decree of the Head of BAPETEN No. 1211/K/V/2021 concerning the Determination of Indonesian Diagnostic Reference Level Values for X-ray Ct Scan and General Radiography Modalities (Ratnawati et al, 2019;Winkler, 1976). Where in this decision the ESAK value for Chast PA is 0.4 mGy, so the ESAK value in this study still meets the national I-DRL value (Proost & Meijer, 1992;Bonello et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%