1997
DOI: 10.1117/12.277766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Polygon scanners revisited</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most signnificant but inherent error is produced by the very construction of the polygon, that is by the eccentricity of the facets with regard to the pivot of the PM (in contrast to the GS, which has the rotational axis in the reflective plane of the oscillatory mirror). This produces [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] a multi-parameter non-linear scanning function which we have explored [13,14] -as presented in Section 6. As for the GS, the PM non-linarity of the scanning function requires a f-theta lens.…”
Section: Galvanometer-based and Polygon Scannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most signnificant but inherent error is produced by the very construction of the polygon, that is by the eccentricity of the facets with regard to the pivot of the PM (in contrast to the GS, which has the rotational axis in the reflective plane of the oscillatory mirror). This produces [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] a multi-parameter non-linear scanning function which we have explored [13,14] -as presented in Section 6. As for the GS, the PM non-linarity of the scanning function requires a f-theta lens.…”
Section: Galvanometer-based and Polygon Scannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Scanners with rotating mirrors: monogon / plane mirror [4,5] or polygonal [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] -the latter prismatic or pyramidal, regular or irregular;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most utilized types of scanners -even since the early 90s -are the galvanometer-based (GS) [5][6][7][8][9]. Precise, reasonably fast, small and versatile, they have various applications in OCT and CM, mostly for the lateral scanning of the samples -with dual axes orthogonal galvomirror [10] (but also for polygon plus GS setups, as pointed out above).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main types of scanners are [1,2]: rotating monogons or polygonal mirrors [7][8][9], galvanometer-based [10], and refractive -the latter mostly with Risley prisms [11][12][13], holographic, acousto-and electro-optical devices. They have been studied extensively [14], with regard to their specific applications -thus, to their necessary level of performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their drawbacks are related to their multiple sources of errors [5], but their major issue is due to their inherent construction: the distance between the pivot and the facet produces a displacement of the point on which the reflection is produced on the PM facet -by contrast to the cases of the monogon rotational or of galvanometer (oscillatory) scanners, for which the laser beam can be focused on the rotational or oscillatory axis (which can be further more placed in the plane of the mirror). A designing calculus has been developed in the 90s on PMs [10], the issues of their lens and of the positioning of the PMs with regard to the optical axes of the lenses was studied [11], the scan patterns produced were investigated [12,13], and their perspectives were highlighted [14,15], despite the fact that they were replaced by galvoscanners in most applications in the 90s. We have developed an analysis of PM scanners [7], both analythical [9,16] and numerical [17], in an optomechanical approach.…”
Section: Optomechatronic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%