1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.197595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Optoacoustic effects during Er:YAG laser ablation in hard dental tissue</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with standard, bell or quasisquare-shaped erbium pulse modes, 13 these requirements are to a certain extent contradictory, as parameters that may be optimal, e.g., achieving fastest ablation, may not be optimal when minimal vibrations and noise are required. 14,15 For example, it is well understood that ablation thresholds decrease toward shorter pulse durations, [16][17][18][19] where short pulses are pulses shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the ablated tissue. 18,19 At shorter times, the energy has little time to escape from the ablated volume, and so less heat is diffused into the surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, with standard, bell or quasisquare-shaped erbium pulse modes, 13 these requirements are to a certain extent contradictory, as parameters that may be optimal, e.g., achieving fastest ablation, may not be optimal when minimal vibrations and noise are required. 14,15 For example, it is well understood that ablation thresholds decrease toward shorter pulse durations, [16][17][18][19] where short pulses are pulses shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the ablated tissue. 18,19 At shorter times, the energy has little time to escape from the ablated volume, and so less heat is diffused into the surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,27 However, this approach may not be always appropriate since, especially for tissues with relatively low water content, the ablation efficacy has been observed to get progressively reduced upon consecutive delivery of laser pulses. 28,29 When using such cumulative ablation methods, the measurement process influences the ablation process, which is being studied, and therefore, erroneous results and conclusions may be reached. For example, it is well known that for dental enamel, the ablation process completely stalls after a consecutive delivery of ∼10 laser pulses, unless the enamel is cooled by an external water spray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also improves ablation efficiency (AE) in enamel by preventing a reduction or even stalling without further tissue removal when a series of laser pulses is delivered to the tissue. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] As shown by measurements of the optoacoustic signal for a series of consecutive Er:YAG laser pulses, the optoacoustic energy is larger for initial pulses and is reduced toward the end of the pulse sequence. 11,12 With water applied in-between pulses, no reduction in the optoacoustic signal is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These so-called optodynamic phenomena have received considerable attention in the context of characterization of laser ablation. Various set-ups have been examined for this purpose: spatially resolved techniques, such as schlieren [9] and [10], shadowgraphy [11] to [14] or holography [15], as well as the temporally resolved ones: laser interferometer [16] to [18], laser beam deflection probe [19] and [20] and capacitive or piezoelectric acoustic sensors [7], [8] and [21]. While most of these techniques represent useful research tools within controlled laboratory experiments, only a few of them exhibit the potential to be used for on-line process monitoring in real medical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods of shock wave characterization using acoustic sensors rely on empirically selected signal features, such as acoustic signal energy, signal amplitude and time of flight [7], [21] and [22]. Relationships of these signal features to other influencing factors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%