2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.386444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Metrics of resolution and performance for CD-SEMs</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a cross-correlation function using a single or two images also provides an estimate of SNR (Frank and Al-Ali 1975, Joy et al 2000, Thong et al 2001, the signal is as same as the "image" signal. An image of the expected z value E{z}(= f ) corresponds to the denoised image, which is a by-product in the R calculation.…”
Section: Basic Concept Of the Contrast-to-gradient Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a cross-correlation function using a single or two images also provides an estimate of SNR (Frank and Al-Ali 1975, Joy et al 2000, Thong et al 2001, the signal is as same as the "image" signal. An image of the expected z value E{z}(= f ) corresponds to the denoised image, which is a by-product in the R calculation.…”
Section: Basic Concept Of the Contrast-to-gradient Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An emphasis is put on a potential for wide applicability of the CG method to the measurements of image resolution, not the exact beam profile. Here, all values of R(DFT) to be compared with R(CG) are calculated using our version of the Scion Image software (Scion Corp.; Joy et al 2000) (ref. Appendix A1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation-based method (Frank 1980, Joy et al 2000, Youn and Egerton 1997 provides a valuable alternative to the Fourier analysis. The finite width of the autocorrelation peak reflects correlations introduced by the image-forming system, effectively approximating the autocorrelation of the PSF.…”
Section: Correlation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] The evaluation of the accuracy of these methods requires serial test SEM images [6,10] with varied parameters, such as structured grains and background, edge effect, blurring, vibration, and noise. Cizmar et al [10] have generated simulated SEM images for the most commonly used samples, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%