1993
DOI: 10.1117/12.141162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>COST 218 evaluation of optical fiber lifetime models</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is the ML model with a safe-stress condition instead of fracture (the value B is hidden in the assumption that the fiber strength is degraded by a maximum of 30% during testing after the proof test). 16 GPa for unloading times lower than 1 s, just as in the ML model without unloading. For the ''low' ' B value, the allowable stress strongly depends on unloading time, 0.08, 0.01, and 0.00 GPa for unloading times of 1 jis, 1 ms, and 1 s, respectively.…”
Section: Alternative Model For Proof Testing On Linementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is the ML model with a safe-stress condition instead of fracture (the value B is hidden in the assumption that the fiber strength is degraded by a maximum of 30% during testing after the proof test). 16 GPa for unloading times lower than 1 s, just as in the ML model without unloading. For the ''low' ' B value, the allowable stress strongly depends on unloading time, 0.08, 0.01, and 0.00 GPa for unloading times of 1 jis, 1 ms, and 1 s, respectively.…”
Section: Alternative Model For Proof Testing On Linementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this case the graphical shifting can also be represented by a very simple formula. 16 32 In this model a safe stress is specified, such that crack growth will not cause the fiber to weaken by more than 0.5% instead of causing fracture. The safe-stress model looks safer than it is.…”
Section: Alternative Model For Proof Testing On Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our studies go beyond previously published work by examining the reliability of fibres operating directly in the C-band. This consisted of a series of experiments, based on previously proposed models and experiments [1,4,6] to ensure a direct comparison can be made. Single mode fibres with both loss and bend insensitivity were subjected to a range of conditions involving bend induced loss and CW power handling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%