1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.152242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of optical fiber lifetime models based on the power law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difficulty is further aggravated if proof testing is performed in-line during manufacture, which means the fiber has a strength characteristic of the environment closer to that of the draw furnace, which is much drier than ambient. 2 This issue can be resolved if the humidity dependence of strength is well understood, which is one purpose of the work described here. Finally, current industry standards assume a power law form for the stress dependence of fatigue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difficulty is further aggravated if proof testing is performed in-line during manufacture, which means the fiber has a strength characteristic of the environment closer to that of the draw furnace, which is much drier than ambient. 2 This issue can be resolved if the humidity dependence of strength is well understood, which is one purpose of the work described here. Finally, current industry standards assume a power law form for the stress dependence of fatigue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most fibers are proof tested at a typical stress of 0.7 GPa 1 to assure a minimum strength. 2 Lifetime predictions are then made based on the proof stress, but in this procedure some questionable assumptions are made. Firstly, the ambient environment of the proof test is generally assumed to be the same as the service environment to avoid having to determine the dependence of strength on the water activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Griffioen 6 suggests that these extrapolations are effectively in opposite directions -the crack velocity is similar for both small cracks on a short time scale and large cracks on a long time scale. Therefore the effects cancel leaving predictions insensitive to the kinetics function.…”
Section: Is the Form Of The Kinetics Function Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical experiment is a double cantilever beam test, in which a constant force is applied to a predetermined length of crack on a glass sample, and the crack propagation velocity is measured as a function of the force . The most widely used model to describe the slow crack growth is based on an empirical power law:V=A(KI/KIc)n where V is the crack growth velocity, n is termed the stress corrosion susceptibility parameter, or the fatigue parameter, K I is stress intensity factor, K IC is the critical value of K I , or fracture toughness, and A is the environmental parameter which has a Arrhenius temperature dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical experiment is a double cantilever beam test, in which a constant force is applied to a predetermined length of crack on a glass sample, and the crack propagation velocity is measured as a function of the force. 10,11 The most widely used model to describe the slow crack growth is based on an empirical power law: 12,13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%