2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.466917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Computer-aided methods for quantitative assessment of longitudinal changes in retinal images presenting with maculopathy</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 For this work, the value was empirically chosen to equal one plus the retinal eccentricity, e.g., 3 for 2°, 5 for 4°, etc. Figures 3(b) and 3(c) show Gaussian-filtered and background-subtracted images, respectively.…”
Section: Cone Density Measurement Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 For this work, the value was empirically chosen to equal one plus the retinal eccentricity, e.g., 3 for 2°, 5 for 4°, etc. Figures 3(b) and 3(c) show Gaussian-filtered and background-subtracted images, respectively.…”
Section: Cone Density Measurement Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Levenberg-Marquardt Least-Squares optimization algorithm [10] was used to fit the multiple elementary functions to the image adjusting the functions parameters in order to minimize the mean square error between the model and the image. This approach of modeling the drusen spots improved the drusen segmentation and characterization algorithms already published [11][12][13][14][15][16] by providing a shape consistent segmentation and by being more reproducible.…”
Section: Automatic Quantification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Different image components are separated and analyzed for signal intensity alterations and a 'texture' map is generated from the distribution data [28]. Thresholding-based drusen segmentation uses binary image data of frequency and pixel intensity against a normative background histogram [29]. While the above automated color photographs drusen algorithms are extremely encouraging, soft drusen detection remains problematic due to the difficulty in accurately delineating the blurred margins of large drusen.…”
Section: Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmologymentioning
confidence: 99%