2020
DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s239343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Reevaluation of the Efficacy of First Line Regimen for <em>Helicobacter pylori</em></p>

Abstract: Background: Helicobacter pylori is a common cause of gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and non-ulcer dyspepsia, and is also associated with gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Despite being known about for more than 30 years, finding an effective therapeutic strategy against it remains a challenge. Aim: There are no US studies evaluating the efficacy of a Levofloxacin based therapy for H. pylori infection. We here intend to study the efficacy of Levofloxacin based triple antib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H. pylori infection remains a difficult challenge worldwide, especially in some developing countries ( Hooi et al., 2017 ). Antibiotic regimens have been modified continuously to overcome drug resistance, but the results remain unsatisfactory ( Song et al., 2016 ; Tariq et al., 2020 ). Obviously, the discovery of an effective H. pylori eradication therapy would have global significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H. pylori infection remains a difficult challenge worldwide, especially in some developing countries ( Hooi et al., 2017 ). Antibiotic regimens have been modified continuously to overcome drug resistance, but the results remain unsatisfactory ( Song et al., 2016 ; Tariq et al., 2020 ). Obviously, the discovery of an effective H. pylori eradication therapy would have global significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 However, in a retrospective observational study carried out in the USA comparing the eradication rate between the three first-line regimens, the eradication rate of levofloxacin-based triple therapy was considerably lower (49.2%) than that of clarithromycin-based triple therapy (78.3%). 21 The difference in effectiveness may be due to differences in drug resistance for adults in different regions, with levofloxacin resistance rates of 14.1% in Europe (Western/Central and Southern Europe >20%; Northern European countries <10%), and 31.3% in North America. 22 , 23 Therefore, it is particularly important to establish a regional drug resistance database as soon as possible.…”
Section: Empirical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triple therapy (TT) remains the standard of care in the published international guidelines of the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) in areas of low clarithromycin resistance 4 . Two studies from the Americas looked at the outcomes and both showed poor eradication rates albeit with divergent results for TT with clarithromycin compared to levofloxacin 5,6 . In the US, 78% of patients receiving clarithromycin‐based TT achieved eradication, compared to 49% with levofloxacin‐based TT 5 .…”
Section: Triple Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies from the Americas looked at the outcomes and both showed poor eradication rates albeit with divergent results for TT with clarithromycin compared to levofloxacin 5,6 . In the US, 78% of patients receiving clarithromycin‐based TT achieved eradication, compared to 49% with levofloxacin‐based TT 5 . On the other hand, in Argentina 75% of patients were cured with clarithromycin TT but 93% achieved eradication with levofloxacin TT 6 .…”
Section: Triple Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%