2019
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s178277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Consensus on the management of astigmatism in cataract surgery</p>

Abstract: This project was aimed at achieving consensus on the management of astigmatism during cataract surgery by ophthalmologists from Latin America using modified Delphi technique. Relevant peer-reviewed literature was identified, and 21 clinical research questions associated with the definition, classification, measurement, and treatment of astigmatism during cataract surgery were formulated. Twenty participants were divided into seven groups, and each group was assigned three questions to which they had to respond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
19
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors influencing residual refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery with toric IOLs include accurate preoperative corneal astigmatism measurements, variability in the magnitude and direction of corneal incision SIA, the effects of different toric calculators, the rotational stability of different toric IOLs [8], and reported lens tilt [9]. Several diagnostic devices based on different technologies are available to measure preoperative corneal power and astigmatism, including manual and automated keratometers; Placido-based corneal, point-source color light emitting diode, Scheimpflug image-based, and scanning-slit corneal topographers; low-coherence reflectometers; and intraoperative aberrometers [10][11][12][13]. However, none of these methods are currently considered the gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors influencing residual refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery with toric IOLs include accurate preoperative corneal astigmatism measurements, variability in the magnitude and direction of corneal incision SIA, the effects of different toric calculators, the rotational stability of different toric IOLs [8], and reported lens tilt [9]. Several diagnostic devices based on different technologies are available to measure preoperative corneal power and astigmatism, including manual and automated keratometers; Placido-based corneal, point-source color light emitting diode, Scheimpflug image-based, and scanning-slit corneal topographers; low-coherence reflectometers; and intraoperative aberrometers [10][11][12][13]. However, none of these methods are currently considered the gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 The unstable tear film affects the quality of optical surface reflections from the cornea on which the keratometric measurements are based, compromising keratometry readings with manual keratometry or advanced devices like placido disc/point-source color light-emitting diode topographers, slit-scan imaging, swept source OCT biometers or Scheimpflug image-based tomographers. 9,10 Further, chronic ocular desiccation and deficiency of the tears have also been associated with corneal deformation, most commonly inferior corneal steepening and high astigmatism resembling keratoconus. 11 This could potentially be due to dry eye-induced, prolonged inflammation or eye rubbing or other unknown mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors in uencing residual refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery with toric IOLs include accurate preoperative corneal astigmatism measurements, variability in the magnitude and direc tion of corneal incision SIA, the effects of dif ferent toric calculators, the rotational stability of different toric IOLs [8], and reported lens tilt [9]. Several diagnostic devices based on different technologies are available to measure preoperative corneal power and astigmatism, including manual and automated keratometers; Placidobased corneal, point-source color light emitting diode, Scheimp ug image-based, and scanning-slit corneal topographers; low-coherence re ectometers; and intraoperative aberrometers [10][11][12][13]. However, none of these methods are currently considered the gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%