2014
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i4.18342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Moisture content effect in the relationship between apparent electrical conductivity and soil attributes

Abstract: ABSTRACT. To map the spatial variability of a field to define the variable rate application, an intensive sampling of the soil-plant system is necessary. The apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has been used for soil mapping because it correlates well with soil attributes, allows for dense sampling and can be obtained at low cost. However, ECa is influenced by soil moisture content, and the variability of this attribute can reduce the reliability of the ECa maps to explain the physical and chemical soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Spearman's rank coefficient (with p < 0.0001) for the July survey was 0.64 between EC a -H and SWC and 0.52 between EC a -V and SWC, proving that EMI data mostly reproduced the water patterns and confirming the homogeneity between shallow and deep horizons. On the other hand, for the Oct survey, a significant correlation with SWC was observed only for EC a in horizontal polarization, but it was very low (0.34) and not clearly defined, confirming the results of previous studies where the correlation between EC a and SWC was lower when the soil had higher moisture (Costa et al, 2014). One possible reason was the difference between the soil volume (0-0.30 m) explored by EMI measurements, which reflected a distribution of soil properties throughout the entire profile.…”
Section: Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity Mapssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the Spearman's rank coefficient (with p < 0.0001) for the July survey was 0.64 between EC a -H and SWC and 0.52 between EC a -V and SWC, proving that EMI data mostly reproduced the water patterns and confirming the homogeneity between shallow and deep horizons. On the other hand, for the Oct survey, a significant correlation with SWC was observed only for EC a in horizontal polarization, but it was very low (0.34) and not clearly defined, confirming the results of previous studies where the correlation between EC a and SWC was lower when the soil had higher moisture (Costa et al, 2014). One possible reason was the difference between the soil volume (0-0.30 m) explored by EMI measurements, which reflected a distribution of soil properties throughout the entire profile.…”
Section: Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity Mapssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The negative effect of the grazing over the soil porosity [47,48] and over the soil macroinvertebrates [49,50] has been proved. Besides, the increase of the EC over time could be associated with the decrease of TP, a factor which affects the soil water infiltration [51], and therefore the M, which according to several authors [52,53], was correlated and negatively with the EC (r = -0.52; p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maps developed with parameters of cross -semivariograms and fitted to theoretical models showed moisture for points where measurements were not performed, thus, the moisture evaluations for precision agriculture can be performed by reading electromagnetic induction. This methodology is similar to that described by Costa et al (2014), who mapped soil attributes with precise interpretation and recommendation of managements that can generate economic savings.…”
Section: Revmentioning
confidence: 99%