&lt;b&gt;Estratégias para avaliação da dor em pacientes críticos: um estudo bibliométrico/Strategies for pain assessment in critically ill patients: a bibliometric study&lt;b&gt;

Franco, Andrezza Serpa; Andrade, Karla Biancha Silva de; Santos, Gisele Torres; Camerini, Flávia Giron; Marins, Ana Lúcia Cascardo

doi:10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v16i4.34397

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(2) The second parameter indicates the targeted population. The general population is targeted for most B/P investigations (25,30,76); however, several studies have restricted their population to patients with cancer (100,126), diabetes (130), some critical illness (65), or depression (102). ( 3) Another important parameter is the geographical limit of the populations studied.…”

Section: B/p Studies Using Classical Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls

Robert

Wilson²

2023

Front. Pain Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last decades, the emergence of Bibliometrics and the progress in Pain research have led to a proliferation of bibliometric studies on the medical and scientific literature of pain (B/P). This study charts the evolution of the B/P literature published during the last 30 years. Using various searching techniques, 189 B/P studies published from 1993 to August 2022 were collected for analysis—half were published since 2018. Most of the selected B/P publications use classic bibliometric analysis of Pain in toto, while some focus on specific types of Pain with Headache/Migraine, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, and Cancer Pain dominating. Each study is characterized by the origin (geographical, economical, institutional, …) and the medical/scientific context over a specified time span to provide a detailed landscape of the Pain research literature. Some B/P studies have been developed to pinpoint difficulties in appropriately identifying the Pain literature or to highlight some general publishing pitfalls. Having observed that most of the recent B/P studies have integrated newly emergent software visualization tools (SVTs), we found an increase of anomalies and suggest that readers exercise caution when interpreting results in the B/P literature details.

show abstract

Section: B/p Studies Using Classical Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls

Robert

Wilson²

2023

Front. Pain Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among health professionals, the role of nurses in pain management is praised, emphasizing activities such as exploring and valuing pain complaints; collect data on aggravating factors, personal and family background; investigate the discomfort caused by pain; and using instruments that can help in its measurement and evaluation, effectively intervening in the quality of analgesia (FRANCO et al, 2017;LUIZ et al, 2018;DA SILVA et al, 2019).…”

Section: -Acute Pain In Intensive Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Pain Identification by Nurses in Adult Patients in Intensive Care: State of the Art in Brazil

Taets¹,

Coutinho²,

Taets³

et al. 2022

JHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain is an unpleasant sensation or emotional experience, whether or not associated with tissue damage, of sudden or slow onset, of any intensity. For the most part, because it is a sensation, the patient's verbal report is considered essential for diagnosing pain. However, most patients admitted to intensive care remain sedated or in a coma, making this report impossible. Thus, this study aimed to identify the state of the art on pain in adult patients in intensive care in nursing studies in Brazil. This is an integrative review, whose data collection was carried out in January 2022. Using the descriptors pain, nursing, intensive care and the Boolean connector and, a search was carried out in the Virtual Health Library (BVS). Five articles were considered for analysis. All of them have an author body composed of nurses and nursing students and are randomly distributed over the time established for analysis. From the meaning units present in the analyzed studies, three categories emerged: I-Acute pain in intensive care; II-Non-verbal pain assessment of adult ICU patients; III-Pain for patients in palliative care in intensive care. It was concluded that, although there are some pain assessment methods in intensive care patients, they are still not sufficient for an adequate pain management and, when relevant, the nursing professional's lack of information combined with the lack of adequate protocols for management. of pain in institutions contributes to the neglect of this situation.

show abstract

<b>Estratégias para avaliação da dor em pacientes críticos: um estudo bibliométrico/Strategies for pain assessment in critically ill patients: a bibliometric study<b>

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls

Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls

Pain Identification by Nurses in Adult Patients in Intensive Care: State of the Art in Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About