2010 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/systol.2010.5676060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LPV design of fault-tolerant control for road vehicles

Abstract: The aim of the paper is to present a supervisory decentralized architecture for the design and development of reconfigurable and fault-tolerant control systems in road vehicles. The performance specifications are guaranteed by the local controllers, while the coordination of these components is provided by the supervisor. Since monitoring components and the FDI filters provide the supervisor with information about the various vehicle maneuvers and the different fault operations, it is able to make decisions ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fault-tolerant control currently has two development directions: active fault-tolerant control and passive fault-tolerant control [10,11]. In the field of vehicle fault-tolerant control, scholars have proposed a variety of active and passive fault-tolerant control strategies, including sliding mode control [12,13], adaptive control [14][15][16], fuzzy neural network control [17,18], and robust H∞ and LPV control [19][20][21][22]. Passive fault-tolerant control is advantageous over active fault-tolerant control because it does not require fault detection and isolation units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault-tolerant control currently has two development directions: active fault-tolerant control and passive fault-tolerant control [10,11]. In the field of vehicle fault-tolerant control, scholars have proposed a variety of active and passive fault-tolerant control strategies, including sliding mode control [12,13], adaptive control [14][15][16], fuzzy neural network control [17,18], and robust H∞ and LPV control [19][20][21][22]. Passive fault-tolerant control is advantageous over active fault-tolerant control because it does not require fault detection and isolation units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%