2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04007
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lowering the Size Detection Limits of Ag and TiO2 Nanoparticles by Single Particle ICP-MS

Abstract: As the production and use of engineered nanomaterials increase, there is an urgent need to develop analytical techniques that are sufficiently sensitive to be able to measure the very small nanoparticles (NP) at very low concentrations. Although single particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS) is emerging as one of the best techniques for detecting NP, it is limited by relatively high size detection limits for several NP, including many of the oxides. The use of a high sensitivity sector field ICP-MS (ICP-SF-MS), microsecon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
86
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with studies performed by high-resolution (HR) ICP-MS (Tharaud et al, 2017), the current study presented a slightly higher LOD size in ultrapure water (15 nm vs. 10 nm by HR-ICP-MS) but a significant improvement when analyzing TiO 2 NPs in a matrix containing 50 mg L −1 of Ca (21 nm vs. 37 nm by HR-ICP-MS). Finally, the size detection limits obtained here by single-particle QQQ-ICP-MS in MS/MS mode were at similar levels than those reported by using double-focusing magnetic sector field ICP-MS (ICP-SF-MS): 19.2 nm for samples injected as a wet aerosol (Hadioui et al, 2019) and 20 nm for TiO 2 NPs the snow and rain waters (Azimzada et al, 2020).…”
Section: Size Detection Limitsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In comparison with studies performed by high-resolution (HR) ICP-MS (Tharaud et al, 2017), the current study presented a slightly higher LOD size in ultrapure water (15 nm vs. 10 nm by HR-ICP-MS) but a significant improvement when analyzing TiO 2 NPs in a matrix containing 50 mg L −1 of Ca (21 nm vs. 37 nm by HR-ICP-MS). Finally, the size detection limits obtained here by single-particle QQQ-ICP-MS in MS/MS mode were at similar levels than those reported by using double-focusing magnetic sector field ICP-MS (ICP-SF-MS): 19.2 nm for samples injected as a wet aerosol (Hadioui et al, 2019) and 20 nm for TiO 2 NPs the snow and rain waters (Azimzada et al, 2020).…”
Section: Size Detection Limitsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Peaks were considered if their intensity was greater than the average background + three times the standard deviation of the background. SF-ICP-MS data were processed using Nu Quant software (version 2.2, Nu Instruments, Wrexham, UK [18,39]). A built-in algorithm searches in a fixed window (3-15 ms) for a peak maximum that is greater than the signal of the smoothed background.…”
Section: Sp-icp-ms Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size detection limits (nm) are determined from the threshold intensity (I T ) (counts) used to discriminate between NP and the background according to Equation (1) [15,18].…”
Section: Sp-icp-ms Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, three different sampling campaigns that analyzed filtered waters (<0.45 µm) near a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) confirmed TiO 2 NM presence with electron microscopy and reported Ti values between 0.7 and 3 µg/L (Johnson et al, 2011;de Klein et al, 2016;Markus et al, 2018). Single particle (SP)-ICP-MS was utilized to target and detect smaller TiO 2 particles down to 100 nm in river surface waters without the need for filtration (Peters et al, 2018), and Hadioui et al (2019) have now detected TiO 2 particle sizes down to 19.2 nm with the technique. While progress has been made in detecting low concentrations of TiO 2 NMs (µg/L) in complex environmental matrices, these analyses alone cannot confirm that the particles are anthropogenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%