1992
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.45.7469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower hybrid plasma heating in a magnetic-mirror field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, since the present research on the lower hybrid heating in magnetic mirror devices was done a long time ago, in the relatively modest mirror devices LISA [15,16] and the Wisconsin canted-mirror [17], specific problems remain unclear in modern mirror devices where the plasma and source parameters are much more substantial. For example, as the increment of plasma temperature and source power, the nonlinear stochastic heating mechanism might be dominated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since the present research on the lower hybrid heating in magnetic mirror devices was done a long time ago, in the relatively modest mirror devices LISA [15,16] and the Wisconsin canted-mirror [17], specific problems remain unclear in modern mirror devices where the plasma and source parameters are much more substantial. For example, as the increment of plasma temperature and source power, the nonlinear stochastic heating mechanism might be dominated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the broad range of available wave frequencies, waves in the lower hybrid range of frequency, i.e. lower hybrid waves (LHWs), have extensive applications in many devices [4][5][6][7][8]. They involve helicon wave, lower hybrid fast and slow wave, applied for the current drive, plasma heating and plasma rotation in toroidal devices [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the plasma potential profile, which presents maximum and minimum as a stationary wave, we chose two points of minimum (I = lO.Ocm), so I k , I = 2410 = 0.68cm-'. Another characteristic value was given by I kl I = n/d = 0.18 cm-', where d is the LISA diameter [8]. Thus, 0.18 < k , < 0.68cm-'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%