2013 IEEE International 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/3dic.2013.6702319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low temperature (<180 °C) bonding for 3D integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspiring from the co-sputtered concept, Chen and coworkers proposed a novel bonding method at 180 C using Ti as the passivation layer on Cu surface [42]. Moreover, the interdiffusion behavior of Cu through Ti passivation layer was explained and demonstrated using Auger electron spectroscopy [43]. Cu is known to have the lower activation energy at the surface and the smaller atomic volume (72 bohr 3 ) compared to Ti vacancy volume (75.48 bohr 3 ) [44,45].…”
Section: Cu-cumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspiring from the co-sputtered concept, Chen and coworkers proposed a novel bonding method at 180 C using Ti as the passivation layer on Cu surface [42]. Moreover, the interdiffusion behavior of Cu through Ti passivation layer was explained and demonstrated using Auger electron spectroscopy [43]. Cu is known to have the lower activation energy at the surface and the smaller atomic volume (72 bohr 3 ) compared to Ti vacancy volume (75.48 bohr 3 ) [44,45].…”
Section: Cu-cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of Constantan is that its density is lower than that of pure Cu (Ni has higher atomic radius of 1.49 Å than Cu (1.41 Å )). Added to this, Cu is known to have lower activation energy at the surface [43]. Thus, under external stimulus such as temperature and pressure, constantan is not a hindrance for Cu diffusion.…”
Section: Low Temperature Cu-cu Bonding Using Metal-alloymentioning
confidence: 99%