Low‐tar, highly burnable gas production from the gasification of pelletized palm empty fruit bunch

Abstract

Gasification is an attractive method to convert lignocellulosic biomass into a combustible gas mixture for electricity and power generation. To control the tar concentration in the produced gas to be within the allowable limit of downstream applications, it is important for a gasification system to be integrated with a tar removal process. In this study, an integrated gasification system consisting of a downdraft gasifier and a secondary catalytic tar‐cracking reactor was designed and tested for the gasification of pelletized oil palm empty fruit bunch. To further purify the producer gas, the system was also integrated with a cyclone, a water scrubber, and a carbon‐bed filter. Biomass was fed at a rate of 5 kg/h, while the air equivalence ratio (ER) and the gasification temperature were set at 0.1 and 800°C, respectively. In total, 5 kg of the specially developed low‐cost Fe/activated carbons (AC) catalyst was used in the hot gas catalytic tar‐cracking reactor. Results indicate that our integrated gasification system was able to produce a clean burnable gas with a lower heating value (LHV) of 9.05 MJ/Nm3, carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of 79.4%, cold gas efficiency (CGE) of 89.9%, and H2 and CH4 concentrations of 29.5% and 10.3%, respectively. The final outlet gas was found to only contain 32.5 mg/Nm3 of tar, thus making it suitable for internal combustion engine (ICE) application.

Carbon-neutral synfuel production via continuous solar H2O and CO2 gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch

“…ΔH°=247 kJ/mol (7) Previous studies on EFB gasification were mostly based on conventional gasification processes [21][22][23][24], including direct gasification (autothermal gasifier) [25,26], indirect gasification (allothermal gasifier) [27,28], supercritical water gasification [29], fluidized bed gasification [30], catalytic gasification [31], and techno-economic analyses [32]. Regarding the solar gasification of EFB, the effects of temperature, H2O/EFB molar ratio, and EFB flowrate on gasification performance were experimentally assessed, and optimal operating parameters were examined using a central composite design [33].…”