2009
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/185/2/526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LOW-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY OF GAMMA-RAY BURST OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS: BIASES IN THE SWIFT SAMPLE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ABSORBERS

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
302
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
22
302
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas-to-dust and metal-to-dust ratios for GRB 100219A are high as it is generally the case for GRBs, (Watson & Jakobsson, 2012), above the values for the local group Zafar et al 2011. This is usually explained by ionization of HI and in particular dust destruction by the GRB (Watson et al, 2007;Campana et al, 2009;Fynbo et al, 2009). This could also explain the very large difference between optical and X-ray column densities (about a factor of 10), as generally found for GRBs, since X-ray absorption is not affected by ionization and hence most metals are found in highly ionized states due to the absence of a large column density of moderately ionized metals (Schady et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sed From X-ray To Irmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Gas-to-dust and metal-to-dust ratios for GRB 100219A are high as it is generally the case for GRBs, (Watson & Jakobsson, 2012), above the values for the local group Zafar et al 2011. This is usually explained by ionization of HI and in particular dust destruction by the GRB (Watson et al, 2007;Campana et al, 2009;Fynbo et al, 2009). This could also explain the very large difference between optical and X-ray column densities (about a factor of 10), as generally found for GRBs, since X-ray absorption is not affected by ionization and hence most metals are found in highly ionized states due to the absence of a large column density of moderately ionized metals (Schady et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sed From X-ray To Irmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…All numbers are normalized to the total number of triggered events. The triggered events from our simulation are plotted in red; the selected Swift GRBs sample (Fynbo et al 2009) is plotted in blue for comparison. Figure 1 shows our preliminary results based on the GRB characteristics discussed above.…”
Section: Introduction and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this Swift-detected GRB sample is a sub-sample of all GRBs observed by Swift. This sub-sample is selected by Fynbo et al (2009), using criteria for choosing GRBs that produce an event sample that is relatively unaffected by selection biases in redshift measurements.…”
Section: Introduction and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the more widely understood effects are discussed by Fynbo et al [1] in detail. Optical biases have reduced the fraction of Swift triggered OAs, and have introduced a selection towards detecting the brightest OAs, hence the more nearby bursts.…”
Section: Grb Optical Selection Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The host galaxies are usually too faint to make a significant contribution to the spectra. Most GRB spectroscopic redshifts are acquired by large aperture ground based telescopes, including VLT, Gemini-S-N, Keck and Lick (see [1] for a more complete list along with specific spectroscopy instruments). The measurement of a GRB redshift depends strongly on the limiting sensitivity and spectral coverage of the spectroscopic system.…”
Section: Redshift Desertmentioning
confidence: 99%