2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2210082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low resistance tunnel junctions with type-II heterostructures

Abstract: We propose tunnel junctions with type-II heterostructures to reduce the electrical resistance of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. We fabricated the type-II tunnel junctions on GaAs substrates, which consist of highly C-doped GaAsSb on the p side and highly Si-doped InGaAs on the n side. We achieved an extremely low specific resistance of 4×10−6Ωcm2, which corresponded to a resistance of 20Ω for an aperture 5μm in diameter. The specific resistance of the type-II tunnel junction was about 40% smaller tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be observed, for materials lattice matched to InP (Ga 0.47 In 0.53 As/GaAs 0.51 Sb 0.49 ) the band discontinuities are larger than for compositions of materials closer to the GaAs lattice constant. Since the tunneling barrier height and width depends on these discontinuities, 15 the tunneling probability enhancement provided by the type-II alignment should be less pronounced in our tunnel junction. This obviously affects the tunnel junction performance, as will be shown in Sec.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Band Offsets In The Gainas/gaassb Sysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As can be observed, for materials lattice matched to InP (Ga 0.47 In 0.53 As/GaAs 0.51 Sb 0.49 ) the band discontinuities are larger than for compositions of materials closer to the GaAs lattice constant. Since the tunneling barrier height and width depends on these discontinuities, 15 the tunneling probability enhancement provided by the type-II alignment should be less pronounced in our tunnel junction. This obviously affects the tunnel junction performance, as will be shown in Sec.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Band Offsets In The Gainas/gaassb Sysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Moreover, another benefit of using this material in a GaInAs/GaAsSb tunnel junction is the type-II band alignment that these structures exhibit, which is reported to facilitate the tunneling of carriers via a lower tunneling barrier. 15 Pseudomorphic GaAsSb/ GaInAs structures were developed in the past for InP-based tandem solar cells, 16 achieving extremely high peak current densities over 19 kA/cm 2 . State-of-the-art Ga 0.47 In 0.53 As/ GaAs 0.51 Sb 0.49 tunnel junctions lattice-matched to InP substrates exhibit peak tunneling currents over 572 kA/cm 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BTJ structure enabled us to replace a relatively high-resistive p-layer with the low-resistive n-type spacer and to decrease the chip resistance [4]. Moreover, a small specific resistance of 4 x 10-6 Qcm2 was achieved with the proposed type-II TJ of n-InGaAs/p-GaAsSb [5]. In addition to these reductions in resistance, for high-speed operation, differential gain is expected to increase because current injection uniformity is improved by electron injection with high mobility [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, tunnel junctions have been fabricated using Si [2,3], Si/SiGe [4,5], GaAs [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], InAs/Si [16], GaInAs/GaInNAs [17], InP/InGaAs [18], GaAsSb/InGaAs [19] and InAsP/GaAsP [20]. These tunnel junctions found numerous applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%