2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low pore connectivity in natural rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
146
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cai and Yu (2011) introduced fractal to characterize the tortuosity of imbibition streamline, and theoretically found that the time exponent was related to tortuosity fractal dimension. Hu et al (2012) demonstrated that the time exponent can reflect the pore connectivity of the tight rock. As the curve degree of flowlines of the SI increases, the pore connectivity decreases and the tortuosity grows, which leads to higher resistance to SI and a time exponent lower than 0.5.…”
Section: Completely Counter-current Imbibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai and Yu (2011) introduced fractal to characterize the tortuosity of imbibition streamline, and theoretically found that the time exponent was related to tortuosity fractal dimension. Hu et al (2012) demonstrated that the time exponent can reflect the pore connectivity of the tight rock. As the curve degree of flowlines of the SI increases, the pore connectivity decreases and the tortuosity grows, which leads to higher resistance to SI and a time exponent lower than 0.5.…”
Section: Completely Counter-current Imbibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low imbibition rate suggests that the matrix reflects a relatively low pore connectivity depicted by the slope in the curve [log (cumulative imbibition) vs. log (imbibition time)]. Hu et al (2012) proposed that the matrix in Barnett shale presents imbibition behavior of 0.26, indicating the low pore connectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Makhanov et al (2012) found that imbibition rates perpendicular and parallel to the bedding plane are different, and the latter is higher. Hu et al (2012) considered that the Barnett shale has a poor connectivity, which greatly influences the flow and diffusion of fluid. Roychaudhuri et al (2013) determined that a surfactant can effectively reduce the imbibition rate of fracturing fluids, and the driving force of imbibition is the capillary pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%