1988
DOI: 10.1063/1.100291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-noise modular microsusceptometer using nearly quantum limited dc SQUIDs

Abstract: A flexible combination of superconducting integrated circuits was used to construct a low-temperature magneto-optic microsusceptometer utilizing a dc superconducting quantum inteference device (SQUID) detector operating near the quantum limit (coupled energy sensitivity of 1.7ℏ). Miniature pick-up loop assemblies on transparent substrates were joined by superconducting interchip connections to a thin-film dc SQUID, which is in turn read out by a second dc SQUID connected to room-temperature electronics. Measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the Pb SOTs display flux noise as low as ܵ ) ଵȀଶ = 50 nΦ 0 /Hz 1/2 . This is one of the lowest flux noise levels ever achieved [16][17][18] in SQUIDs. The ultimate flux noise in SQUIDs is determined by the quantum noise 8,19 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the Pb SOTs display flux noise as low as ܵ ) ଵȀଶ = 50 nΦ 0 /Hz 1/2 . This is one of the lowest flux noise levels ever achieved [16][17][18] in SQUIDs. The ultimate flux noise in SQUIDs is determined by the quantum noise 8,19 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method opens the possibility of applying ac susceptibility experiments to characterize two-dimensional arrays of single molecule magnets within a wide range of temperatures and frequencies. The ac magnetic susceptibility of magnetic nanoparticles and single molecule magnets (SMMs) provides useful information on their spin and magnetic anisotropy, 1 as well as on the magnetic relaxation mechanisms.2-4 Miniaturized superconducting quantum interference devices [5][6][7][8][9] (SQUIDs) should eventually become capable 8,10 of measuring the magnetization reversal of a SMM (µ i ∼ 20µ B for the archetypal Mn 12 molecule). However, detecting the linear response sets even more stringent conditions: at T = 1 K, a magnetic field H = 24 A/m (0.3 Oe) induces a magnetic polarization µ ≃ 0.007µ B on the same Mn 12 cluster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-4 Miniaturized superconducting quantum interference devices [5][6][7][8][9] (SQUIDs) should eventually become capable 8,10 of measuring the magnetization reversal of a SMM (µ i ∼ 20µ B for the archetypal Mn 12 molecule). However, detecting the linear response sets even more stringent conditions: at T = 1 K, a magnetic field H = 24 A/m (0.3 Oe) induces a magnetic polarization µ ≃ 0.007µ B on the same Mn 12 cluster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of this SQUID amplifier are even more promising, see for example reference [16] or chapter 8 in reference [3]. The minimum sensitivity that can be reached in a measurement is predicted to be quantum limited [16][17][18] and some experiments on dc-SQUIDs or related devices approach this limit [19,20]. Possible applications of SQUID amplifiers are for example voltmeters [21], metrology [22,23], the readout of cryogenic particle detectors [24,25] or the detection of gravitational waves [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Motivation and Overview Of The Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to solve this problem is a two-stage SQUID setup [2,18,89,90], which is shown in Fig. 1.6(b).…”
Section: Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%