2013
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity

Abstract: A DC SQUID consists of a superconducting loop with two Josephson junctions or weak links. Its operation is based on the fact that as a result of quantum interference the maximum dissipationless current I c that can flow through the SQUID is periodic in the magnetic flux Φ through the loop 7

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

7
396
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
396
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1b shows a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of such a SOT thermometer (tSOT) with an effective diameter of 46 nm, as determined from its quantum interference pattern. Similar SOT devices have previously been reported 22,23 . The electrical characteristics of the tSOT (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Figure 1b shows a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of such a SOT thermometer (tSOT) with an effective diameter of 46 nm, as determined from its quantum interference pattern. Similar SOT devices have previously been reported 22,23 . The electrical characteristics of the tSOT (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…In particular, for any value of the applied flux Φ , control currents exist that will bias the mSOT to the most sensitive working point, thus eliminating the blind spots. A more detailed theoretical study shows that this powerful control is applicable to any SQUID with at least three junctions and three terminals, including asymmetric junctions, non-sinusoidal current-phase relations, and the presence of finite inductance 49 .Note that due to its very small size, the geometric inductance of the SOT is about two orders of magnitude smaller than its kinetic inductance 22,24,49 (see S2 for details). As a result, the control currents affect the superconducting phases across the junctions with negligible change to the self-induced flux in the SQUID loop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to conventional two-terminal/two-junction SQUIDs that display optimal sensitivity when flux biased to about a quarter of the flux quantum, the additional terminals and junctions allow optimal sensitivity at arbitrary applied flux, thus eliminating the magnetic field "blind spots". We demonstrate spin sensitivity of 5 to 8 µ B /Hz 1/2 over a continuous field range of 0 to 0.5 T, with promising applications for nanoscale scanning magnetic imaging.KEYWORDS: superconducting quantum interference device, SQUID on tip, nanoscale magnetic imaging, current-phase relations 2 In recent years, there has been a growing effort to develop and apply nanoscale magnetic imaging tools in order to address the rapidly evolving fields of nanomagnetism and spintronics.These include magnetic force microscopy (MFM) 1,2 , magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM) [3][4][5] , nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers sensors [6][7][8][9] , scanning Hall probe microscopy (SHPM) 10-12 , x-ray magnetic microscopy (XRM) 13 , and micro-or nano-superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] based scanning microscopy (SSM) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Scanning micro-and nanoscale SQUIDs are of particular interest for magnetic imaging due to their high sensitivity and large bandwidth 15,19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scanning SQUIDs typically require a probe temperature of 10 K or lower, and generally offer micron-size spatial resolution, although recent studies have enhanced the resolution to submicron scales 9 . Lorentz TEM can provide images with high spatial resolution and magnetic contrast, but requires very thin samples, typically less than 100 nm thick.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%