2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2013.6575587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-loss design and fabrication of multimode polymer optical waveguide circuit with crossings for high-density optical PCB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) in both SI-core and GI-core crossed waveguides. Figure 2 shows the results we previously reported [19]. Here, the total (accumulated) loss due to the crossings is plotted with respect to the number of crossing for the SI-and GI-core crossed waveguides.…”
Section: Optical Loss Due To Crossing Structurementioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(2) in both SI-core and GI-core crossed waveguides. Figure 2 shows the results we previously reported [19]. Here, the total (accumulated) loss due to the crossings is plotted with respect to the number of crossing for the SI-and GI-core crossed waveguides.…”
Section: Optical Loss Due To Crossing Structurementioning
confidence: 71%
“…In Fig. 2, the experimentally measured loss for a GI-core crossed waveguide is compared [19], which shows remarkably low values as calculated, but they are even lower than the simulated result.…”
Section: Optical Loss Due To Crossing Structurementioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, the accumulated losses of all the crossings are plotted with respect to the number of crossings. The detailed calculation conditions are indicated in [10], but it should be emphasized that the refractive index of the intersection is supposed to be uniform, namely SI, even if other straight regions have GI profiles. In the aforementioned SI core, the lightwave is not confined if the cladding is missing.…”
Section: Ray Trace Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%