2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐latitude ionospheric D region dependence on solar zenith angle

Abstract: Phase and amplitude measurements of VLF radio signals on a short, nearly all-sea path between two Hawaiian Islands are used to find the height and sharpness of the lower edge of the daytime tropical D region as a function of solar zenith angle (SZA). The path used was from U.S. Navy transmitter NPM (21.4 kHz) on Oahu to Keauhou, 306 km away, on the west coast of the Big Island of Hawaii, where ionospheric sensitivity was high due to the destructive interference between the ionospherically reflected wave and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the galactic cosmic ray intensity at ionospheric heights varies with geomagnetic shielding and hence geomagnetic latitude [e.g., Heaps , ], the variations with SZA in H ′ and β are dependent on geomagnetic latitude as has been observed and reported by Thomson et al . []. The highest‐latitude path reported there was for NAU in Puerto Rico to St. John's in Canada for which the path midpoint is at a geographic latitude of 33° and a geomagnetic dip latitude of 37° as compared with the much higher values of 54.5° and 52.5°, respectively, for the current path.…”
Section: Discussion Summary and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the galactic cosmic ray intensity at ionospheric heights varies with geomagnetic shielding and hence geomagnetic latitude [e.g., Heaps , ], the variations with SZA in H ′ and β are dependent on geomagnetic latitude as has been observed and reported by Thomson et al . []. The highest‐latitude path reported there was for NAU in Puerto Rico to St. John's in Canada for which the path midpoint is at a geographic latitude of 33° and a geomagnetic dip latitude of 37° as compared with the much higher values of 54.5° and 52.5°, respectively, for the current path.…”
Section: Discussion Summary and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From Thomson et al . [], when the mean SZA on the NAU to St. John's path changed from 33° to 70°, H ′ changed from 71.6 km to 76.9 km and β from 0.41 km −1 to 0.285 km −1 , while from Figure , for the DHO‐Eskdalemuir path, for the same SZA change from 33° to 70°, H ′ changed from 72.8 km to 76.2 km and β from 0.345 km −1 to 0.275 km −1 . The lower β and the smaller changes in β and H ′ with SZA on the DHO‐Eskdalemuir path are likely due to the greater proportion of non‐SZA‐dependent ionization (galactic cosmic rays) on this higher‐latitude path.…”
Section: Discussion Summary and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key point in the data processing of atmospheric parameters is the separation between daytime and nighttime mesospheric conditions. Since the reflection height of the VLF waves changes between about 70 km during the day to 90 km at night (Thomson et al, , , ), we separated the temperature profiles into daytime and nighttime height ranges which were set as 70–75 and 83–88 km, respectively. The same criteria is not applied to the NO profiles because of the large amounts of missing data in those range of altitudes and so, due to this limitation, NO VMR data in the height range of 90–95 km were used for both daytime and nighttime analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, the electron density N e as a function of height h is given as follows: Ne()h=1.43×107cm3[]exp()0.15Hexp[]()β0.15()hH0.25em50h90, where H′ is in km and β in km −1 . This formulation is commonly used in research using the technique of VLF signals [e.g., Thomson and McRae , ; Thomson et al , ]. With the geographic location of the transmitter and the receiver and the time in UTC as inputs, the code determines a single ambient value of each of the two parameters which is used for the complete transmitter‐receiver link [ Poulsen et al , ].…”
Section: Data and The Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%