2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-011-9329-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low incidence and prevalence of primary biliary cirrhosis in Canterbury, New Zealand: a population-based study

Abstract: This is the first population-based epidemiological study of PBC conducted in New Zealand and only the second in the Southern Hemisphere. The incidence and prevalence are lower than the Northern Hemisphere, even though the majority of our population has shared genetic background with some of these countries. Our study has provided further support to the hypothesis that there may be a protective effect or lack of a risk factor for PBC in New Zealand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies from other places have generally found incidence rates of 1 to 2 per 100,000 per year with increasing time trends, and it remains uncertain whether the different incidence rates across time and place merely reflect the fact that more recent studies are better at finding people with PBC. However, the low incidence rates reported from the Netherlands during 2000-2007 (1 per 100,000) [44] and from New Zealand in 2008 (0.8 per 100,000) [46] suggest that this is not the only explanation -differences in the prevalence of risk factors for PBC almost certainly contribute to the low incidence rates. Studies of risk factors for PBC are more advanced than studies of risk factors for the other autoimmune liver diseases.…”
Section: Aihmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies from other places have generally found incidence rates of 1 to 2 per 100,000 per year with increasing time trends, and it remains uncertain whether the different incidence rates across time and place merely reflect the fact that more recent studies are better at finding people with PBC. However, the low incidence rates reported from the Netherlands during 2000-2007 (1 per 100,000) [44] and from New Zealand in 2008 (0.8 per 100,000) [46] suggest that this is not the only explanation -differences in the prevalence of risk factors for PBC almost certainly contribute to the low incidence rates. Studies of risk factors for PBC are more advanced than studies of risk factors for the other autoimmune liver diseases.…”
Section: Aihmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The explanation is that PBC is very much a disease of old age -more so than AIH -and the Icelandic population is older than the WHO World Standard Population. So, the upside of choosing the WHO World Standard Population is that the standardized incidence in Iceland is readily comparable with the standardized incidence in New Zealand [46] , because the 2 studies used the same standard population. The downside is that the standardized incidence in Iceland is not good for estimating the actual number of PBC patients in Iceland.…”
Section: Aihmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noticed that the incidence of PBC in New Zealand, Australia was particularly low compared to those reported in other locations for a similar period. [24] After removing the study by Ngu et al,[24] a significantly positive correlation between HDI and PBC incidence was observed [β = 7.645 ± 6.320 (95% CI), r = 0.463, P = 0.020] (Figure 1b). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Countries with a very high HDIs presented a mean PBC incidence of 1.981 per 100,000 per year (Standard deviation (SD): 0.842), while high HDI countries had a mean PBC incidence of 1.544 per 100,000 per year (SD: 0.641). Similarly, we removed the study conducted in New Zealand, Australia by Ngu et al,[24] and found that PBC was significantly more prevalent in countries with higher HDIs ( P = 0.045 by ANOVA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation