2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b01133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Ice Adhesion on Nano-Textured Superhydrophobic Surfaces under Supersaturated Conditions

Abstract: Ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces can significantly increase in humid environments because of frost nucleation within the textures. Here, we studied frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces with various surface morphologies using direct microscale imaging combined with macroscale adhesion tests. Whereas ice adhesion increases on microtextured surfaces, a 15-fold decrease is observed on nanotextured surfaces. This reduction is because of the inhibition of frost formation within the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent years, many researches have been focusing on developing environmental friendly passive icephobic surfaces that can repel the incoming cold water droplets, [3][4][5][6] delay ice nucleation, [7][8][9] and reduce ice adhesion strength. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Since ice formation on the surface was proven to be inevitable under harsh environment, numbers of studies have been devoted to develop surfaces with low ice adhesion strength (<100 kPa). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] To date, one of the most famous icephobic surfaces, the slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS), had achieved ultralow ice adhesion strengths of ∼15, 24 1.7, 26 and 0.4 kPa, 27 in different studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, many researches have been focusing on developing environmental friendly passive icephobic surfaces that can repel the incoming cold water droplets, [3][4][5][6] delay ice nucleation, [7][8][9] and reduce ice adhesion strength. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Since ice formation on the surface was proven to be inevitable under harsh environment, numbers of studies have been devoted to develop surfaces with low ice adhesion strength (<100 kPa). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] To date, one of the most famous icephobic surfaces, the slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS), had achieved ultralow ice adhesion strengths of ∼15, 24 1.7, 26 and 0.4 kPa, 27 in different studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows easy removal of the frost from the WSC. However, on the coatings with relatively large pores, frost forms and fills each micropore entirely without residual pocket air, [ 63 ] and the resistance to frosting is negatively affected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From that starting point, the typical icephobic coatings must resist to the freezing of the impacting supercooled droplets (repel them or delay their freezing time) [52,58,[80][81][82], lower the freezing temperature of water droplets at continuous solid-liquid contact i.e., sessile droplet mode (freezing temperature depression) [58,77,83] and minimizing or avoiding the frost growth [78,[84][85][86][87]. However, if by some reason icing occurs, another characteristic feature indicating passive icephobicity is the reduced ice adhesion strength compared to plain materials [39,[88][89][90].…”
Section: Nomenclature Of Icing and Criteria For Passive Icephobicity mentioning
confidence: 99%