2018
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2017.2752228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Frequency SAR Radiometric Calibration and Antenna Pattern Estimation by Using Stable Point Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permanent Point Scatterers (PPS): Because there are so few multi-temporal P-band datasets, it has only been possible to assess the value of PPSs in BIOMASS calibration using PALSAR data. From this analysis [3], the most useful types of target appear to be desert with isolated rocks, savanna with isolated trees and urban areas. Radiotelescope antennas are unlikely to be useful as calibrators unless they are pointed towards the satellite.…”
Section: Absolute Radiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Permanent Point Scatterers (PPS): Because there are so few multi-temporal P-band datasets, it has only been possible to assess the value of PPSs in BIOMASS calibration using PALSAR data. From this analysis [3], the most useful types of target appear to be desert with isolated rocks, savanna with isolated trees and urban areas. Radiotelescope antennas are unlikely to be useful as calibrators unless they are pointed towards the satellite.…”
Section: Absolute Radiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a transponder or specially designed passive polarimetric calibrators, it is possible to provide 4 independent scatterers in which only one of the elements of the true scattering matrix is non-zero. Using (11), this leads to an over-determined set of equations for the system errors, Ω and system noise, which also allows for imperfections in the calibrators [3]. The solution scheme derived in [5] led to the conclusion that extremely accurate estimates of Ω were needed to give adequate estimates of system errors, and this required the calibration devices to be located almost exactly where Ω = 0 (near the magnetic equator) or provision of a separate estimate of Ω.…”
Section: Estimating System Errors Using a Transpondermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the MEO-SAR systems tend to have a lower working frequency and stronger signal penetration compared with LEO-SARs [17]. Therefore, the Amazon rainforest may no longer be assumed as homogeneous, as the radar signal is not solely scattered at the canopies of the trees, which makes traditional elevation antenna pattern determination using homogenous distributed targets, such as the Amazon rainforest, inapplicable [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manmade calibrators, like transponders, corner reflectors, and ground receivers, are commonly used to measure the calibration constant. They have known radar cross sections (RCSs) with a high radiometric accuracy (better than 0.2 dB) [5][6][7]. The calibrators are usually placed in a uniform and low noise field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration constant is calculated as the difference between the calibrator's true RCS and its image intensity. However, the layout and maintenance of calibrators is costly; therefore, the calibrator-based method can only be conducted a few times in the whole lifetime of the SAR [5], which influences the measurement accuracy of the constant. Monitoring of the constant is usually undertaken by the measurement of Amazon rainforest, which is a temporal stable and azimuthally isotropic natural target [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%