2010
DOI: 10.1159/000320364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Fluoride Acidic Dentifrice: A Randomized Clinical Trial in a Fluoridated Area

Abstract: Background: Low-fluoride dentifrices have been suggested as alternatives to reduce dental fluorosis risk, but there is no consensus regarding their clinical effectiveness, which has been suggested to be increased when their pH is acidic. Aims: This single-blind randomized clinical trial evaluated the caries increment during the use of a low-fluoride acidic liquid dentifrice. Methods: Four-year-old schoolchildren (n = 1,402) living in a fluoridated area (0.6–0.8 ppm F) were randomly allocated to 4 groups differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since dental caries has become a polarized disease and conventional fluoride therapy seems to have little effect for highrisk groups [Pessan et al, 2008], alternatives have been proposed to increase the effectiveness of fluoridated vehicles Buzalaf et al, 2009;Takeshita et al, 2009;Vilhena et al, 2010;Amaral et al, 2013]. All fluoride varnishes tested in the present study were shown to significantly increase remineralization of enamel carious lesions, following a dose-response relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Since dental caries has become a polarized disease and conventional fluoride therapy seems to have little effect for highrisk groups [Pessan et al, 2008], alternatives have been proposed to increase the effectiveness of fluoridated vehicles Buzalaf et al, 2009;Takeshita et al, 2009;Vilhena et al, 2010;Amaral et al, 2013]. All fluoride varnishes tested in the present study were shown to significantly increase remineralization of enamel carious lesions, following a dose-response relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The preventative effect of low-fluoride dentifrice is still a concern in the literature. Winter et al 12 and Vilhena et al 9 demonstrated good performance in preventing new caries lesions in clinical trials using 550 ppm F and 500 ppm F toothpaste, respectively. However, Lima et al 13 showed that in active caries in children, the 1100 ppm F performed better than the 500 ppm F. The low anticaries efficacy of 500 ppm F dentifrice compared with 1000-1100 ppm F dentifrice has been shown experimentally, 14 and it has also been supported by evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Therefore, it is necessary to assess if dentifrices with lower fluoride concentrations (500 ppm F) that are targeted to children younger than six years old are effective against demineralization, and if this preventive effect is the same as those for 1100 ppm F dentifrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 2 and 3 show the studies that reported caries incidence at surface level [Gerdin, 1974;Winter et al, 1989;Sonju-Clasen et al, 1995;Vilhena et al, 2010] and tooth level [Gerdin, 1974;Winter et al, 1989;SonjuClasen et al, 1995;Davies et al, 2002], respectively. All the means were smaller than twice the SD, suggesting that data were highly skewed, which prevented the calculation of a pooled weighted mean difference [Altman and Bland, 1996].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it was not possible to evaluate the baseline balance regarding caries levels, age, gender and socioeconomic status. Thirdly, two studies lasted less than 2 years [Sonju-Clasen et al, 1995;Vilhena et al, 2010], despite the recommendation that trials should last at least 2 years in order to allow a significant number of lesions to develop at the cavitation level [Chesters et al, 2004]. Finally, one trial was quasi-randomized as the interventions were allocated according to the children's month of birth [Gerdin, 1974].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%