2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.094523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy excitations and non-BCS superconductivity in NbxBi2Se3

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model following BCS theory with a T C of 3.0 K is shown by the black line in the inset. It is clear that all the samples follow the trend, consistent with BCS theory for conventional superconductors, and not unconventional as reported by others [18,[20][21][22]24,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Superconductivitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A model following BCS theory with a T C of 3.0 K is shown by the black line in the inset. It is clear that all the samples follow the trend, consistent with BCS theory for conventional superconductors, and not unconventional as reported by others [18,[20][21][22]24,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Superconductivitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Intriguingly, it has been suggested that topological insulators of the Bi 2 Se 3 family could also be turned into topological superconductors [8]. Bulk doping by Cu [9][10][11][12][13], Sr [14][15][16][17], and Nb [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] has indeed led to the observation of (not necessarily topological) superconductivity in these materials. The mechanism driving the superconductivity is widely thought to be metal intercalation in the van der Waals gap between the quintuple layers forming the Bi 2 Se 3 structure [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper and particularly in the supporting information we describe the structure in detail and show how (BiSe) 1.10 NbSe 2 compares with related misfit layered chalcogenides. This misfit phase corresponds to the peaks previously assigned to the BiNbSe 3 impurity 18 (which is of fairly similar composition) by Kobayashi et al 11 and by Cho et al 20 We observe that the amount of the phase present with the Bi 2 Se 3 structure (assumed to be the superconducting phase Nb x Bi 2 Se 3 in the literature 11,12,17,19,20,[22][23][24][25][26] , including very recent literature 19,20,24,25 ) in the samples decreases with increasing Nb content in the synthesis mixture and completely vanishes for x = 0.50 while the superconducting volume fraction of the sample is directly proportional to the Nb content of the sample. In addition we do not observe, with synchrotron resolution, a measurable caxis expansion of the Bi 2 Se 3 -structure phase upon Nb doping, suggesting that it is pure and undoped Bi 2 Se 3 .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The emergent two-fold symmetry in the Knight shift below T c 16 was interpreted by the concept of nematic order 23 , and had triggered many subsequent extensive studies on rotational symmetry breaking by various methods, which also revealed a two-fold symmetry in other physical properties [24][25][26][27][28] . Measurements by transport 29 , penetration depth 30 , and scanning tunneling microscope (STM) 31,32 suggesting unconventional superconductivity have also been reported since then.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%