2021
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.22907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Dose CT in Pelvic Imaging: Comparing Dose and Image Quality in Relation to Clinical Value in a Phantom Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the patient study lacked a trial arm with LD protocols without tin prefiltration to more clearly demonstrate the superiority of tin filter protocols. However, we already showed the superiority of LD CT examinations with tin filtration over radiographs and LD CT examination without tin filtration in follow-up MSK pelvic examinations in a previous phantom study 17 . Stern et al 60 already confirmed these results and described that LD CT with tin filtration were more dose efficient to LD CT without tin filtration for follow-up MSK imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It could be argued that the patient study lacked a trial arm with LD protocols without tin prefiltration to more clearly demonstrate the superiority of tin filter protocols. However, we already showed the superiority of LD CT examinations with tin filtration over radiographs and LD CT examination without tin filtration in follow-up MSK pelvic examinations in a previous phantom study 17 . Stern et al 60 already confirmed these results and described that LD CT with tin filtration were more dose efficient to LD CT without tin filtration for follow-up MSK imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The superiority of LD CT examinations with tin filtration over radiographs in follow-up MSK pelvic examinations in a phantom study has already been described. 17 Following on from this, we first showed in the phantom study that LD protocols in general, and with additional tin filtration in particular are equal to standard ND protocols measured by objective and subjective image analysis for MSK imaging of the Difference between ND and Sn LD in percent relative to the ND protocol per patient category. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To be able to further analyze and better compare clinical value in relation to the applied dose, we calculated a figure of merit (FOM) according to the following formula [31,32]: For an interreader agreement, a two-way mixed, agreement, single-measures intra-class correlation (ICC, R package: psych) was calculated and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results were assigned to poor (< 0.5), moderate (0.50-0.75), good (0.75-0.9) and excellent (> 0.90) interreader agreement [33].…”
Section: Figure Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantitative image analysis, the standard deviation of background noise was determined and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated using the following formula 31,32 :…”
Section: Quantitative Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%