2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low detection limits using sandwich and inhibition assays on long-range surface plasmon waveguide biosensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extended propagation length can offer increased interaction time with the analyte medium, thus providing an improved limit of detection of the sensor. 14,49 Additionally, the penetration depth of the evanescent field lying within the analyte medium is found to be 1284 nm, which is in line with theoretical calculations. 19 Furthermore, the sensitivity of the resonant SPP mode of interest has been calculated and verified experimentally in the wavelength interrogation scheme using two different analyte solutions and a bulk sensitivity of 1133 nm/RIU is accomplished.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This extended propagation length can offer increased interaction time with the analyte medium, thus providing an improved limit of detection of the sensor. 14,49 Additionally, the penetration depth of the evanescent field lying within the analyte medium is found to be 1284 nm, which is in line with theoretical calculations. 19 Furthermore, the sensitivity of the resonant SPP mode of interest has been calculated and verified experimentally in the wavelength interrogation scheme using two different analyte solutions and a bulk sensitivity of 1133 nm/RIU is accomplished.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Besides, more elaborated strategies of functionalization (sandwich, inhibition, competitive) could be explored to enhance the performance currently achieved, as demonstrated on long-range surface plasmon waveguide biosensors in the article [173].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30][31][32] The electromagnetic field generated by LSPR is firmly confined to the surface of metal nanoparticles, therefore, the electric field on the surface of the metal particle is significantly stronger than the electric field far away from the metal particle. LRSPR [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] is an improvement of the traditional SPR. In general, a medium buffer layer is added between the fiber core and the metal film (as shown in Figure 1c).…”
Section: Spr Lspr and Lrsprmentioning
confidence: 99%