2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low density Porcicoll separates spermatozoa from bacteria and retains sperm quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, two low-density Porcicoll (P20 and P30) has been evaluated, and a considerable reduction or complete elimination of some bacteria by both colloids, without affecting sperm quality, was observed. Furthermore, the recovery rates are 86% for P20 and 81% for P30, presenting a very efficient alternative to the use of antibiotics [ 68 ]. In addition, spermatozoa can be separated from bacteria in semen via single-layer centrifugation (SLC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, two low-density Porcicoll (P20 and P30) has been evaluated, and a considerable reduction or complete elimination of some bacteria by both colloids, without affecting sperm quality, was observed. Furthermore, the recovery rates are 86% for P20 and 81% for P30, presenting a very efficient alternative to the use of antibiotics [ 68 ]. In addition, spermatozoa can be separated from bacteria in semen via single-layer centrifugation (SLC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also more difficult microorganisms to remove; for example, flagellated motile bacteria are more challenging to eliminate than non-flagellated ones [ 70 ]. Martínez-Pastor et al [ 68 ] evaluated SLC on modified low-density Porcicoll. A sterile inner tube is included inside some 50 mL centrifuge tubes to facilitate harvesting of the sperm pellet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The special challenge in pig breeding results from the relatively high semen storage temperature (15–18 °C) favouring bacterial growth, the high volume of insemination doses (50 to 100 mL, two to three semen doses per cycle), and the environmental pollution due to seminal backflow into manure (approximately 85% of the inseminated volume; [ 2 , 3 ]), thus providing a source and reservoir of resistance genes in soil and water [ 4 , 5 ]. Attempts to replace conventional antibiotics for boar semen preservation range from the use of alternative antimicrobial substances such as peptides [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], phytoextracts [ 10 , 11 ] or nanoparticles [ 12 ], to the physical removal of bacteria through single layer centrifugation [ 13 , 14 ] and microfiltration [ 15 ]. However, until now, none of the concepts have been feasible for AI practice because they lack antimicrobial efficiency, are sperm-damaging or impracticable and costly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, boar semen may contain many other bacterial species than studied here, either from animal, environmental, or human sources. Among those, Enterococcus species , Pseudomonas , Staphylococcus , Proteus , and E. col i, occur most frequently [ 16 , 17 , 20 , 32 , 33 ]. In the present field data analysis, however, none of these bacteria were identified in low-quality semen samples, indicating that they either were absent or sensitive to the antibiotic in the semen extender or grew only slowly, so that spermicidal effects were not reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%