2022
DOI: 10.1002/stab.202200023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐damage steel structures for enhanced life‐cycle seismic performance

Abstract: How to Cite this Paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the structural engineering community is striving with issues of sustainability (to reduce material consumption, to reuse the structural elements and structures, and to recycle the steel material) and structural resiliency (predictable and timely functional recovery after a strong earthquake [86]). Such examples are presented in [87,88]. Nevertheless, any type of action requires collaboration, combination, and the development of strong relationships between research, construction practices, and policies.…”
Section: Discussion and Aftermathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the structural engineering community is striving with issues of sustainability (to reduce material consumption, to reuse the structural elements and structures, and to recycle the steel material) and structural resiliency (predictable and timely functional recovery after a strong earthquake [86]). Such examples are presented in [87,88]. Nevertheless, any type of action requires collaboration, combination, and the development of strong relationships between research, construction practices, and policies.…”
Section: Discussion and Aftermathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the repair costs in the aftermath of a severe earthquake are very high, and in many cases the more cost-effective option is to demolish the entire structure and rebuild it. To overcome this problem, many studies were recently carried out to develop resilient low-damage structures to quickly restore the structure's full functionality [4][5][6]. Such a design goal can be reached by localizing the damage in the friction devices (also called "friction dampers"), which are mindfully designed for this purpose and which are easily replaceable after the catastrophic event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 represents some examples of novel methods implemented to mitigate the earthquake influences and redistribute forces in the building to avoid an overall collapse. Furthermore, researchers reported the utilization of moment-resisting frames, diaphragms, cross braces, and shear walls to control the momentum and shear forces when seismic activities occur [4][5][6]. Moreover, scholars remarked on the significance of using a tuned mass (pendulum) damper in which a mass is suspended in the center of the building and controls the frequency of the building when earthquakes cause significant vibrations [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%