2004 International Conferce on Test
DOI: 10.1109/test.2004.1387397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low cost concurrent error detection for the advanced encryption standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the overhead due to the parity based concurrent checking, paper [34] describes the low-cost concurrent checking method.…”
Section: Attacks and Countermeasure (If Possible)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the overhead due to the parity based concurrent checking, paper [34] describes the low-cost concurrent checking method.…”
Section: Attacks and Countermeasure (If Possible)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be grouped into four categories: information redundancy, time redundancy, hardware redundancy, and hybrid redundancy. Information redundancy can for example be achieved by adding parity bits [9], [25] (Fig. 1(a)) or by a robust code ( Fig.…”
Section: B Concurrent Error Detection (Ced) Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainly, two approaches have been developed: based on information redundancy (e.g. the use of codes, [1] [2] [3]) or functional redundancy ( [3] [4] [5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the parity prediction requires larger circuitry. Solutions based on parity codes ( [1] [2]) lead to an overhead of about 20% and high single error detection. However they are not effective in case of multiple faults or single faults that lead to an even number of errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation