“…In discordant scores, a consensus reading was performed between the two observers. The IQ of the attenuation of the coronary was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale as follows: score of 1, insufficient attenuation resulting in a non-diagnostic examination; 2, poor, suboptimal attenuation with low diagnostic confidence; 3, fair, acceptable attenuation of relevant cardiac anatomy and vascular access; 4, good, satisfactory attenuation providing sufficient evaluation of relevant anatomy; 5, excellent, strong attenuation of even the smallest arteries [9]. The presence and extent of image artifact was assessed with the 5-point Likert scale as follows: score of 1, non-diagnostic, severe artifact; 2, poor, substantial artifact but sufficient contrast attenuation for assessing the heart system; 3, fair, moderate artifact not interfering with a comprehensive examination of the coronary artery; 4, good, with only minor artifact not interfering with assessment; 5, excellent, with no artifact or any diagnostic limitation [9].…”