IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2005.1494679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-complexity near-optimal spectrum balancing for digital subscriber lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several algorithms were proposed to compute a Nash equilibrium solution (Iterative Waterfilling method (IWFA) [8], [24]) or globally optimal power allocations (dual decomposition method [6], [14], [23]). However, IWFA is known to perform poorly when the interference is strong, while the dual decomposition algorithm is only known to deliver a dual optimal solution [6], [11], [14], [23] rather than the actual optimal transmit power spectra (i.e., primal optimal solution).…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several algorithms were proposed to compute a Nash equilibrium solution (Iterative Waterfilling method (IWFA) [8], [24]) or globally optimal power allocations (dual decomposition method [6], [14], [23]). However, IWFA is known to perform poorly when the interference is strong, while the dual decomposition algorithm is only known to deliver a dual optimal solution [6], [11], [14], [23] rather than the actual optimal transmit power spectra (i.e., primal optimal solution).…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several algorithms were proposed to compute a Nash equilibrium solution (Iterative Waterfilling method (IWFA) [8], [24]) or globally optimal power allocations (dual decomposition method [6], [14], [23]). However, IWFA is known to perform poorly when the interference is strong, while the dual decomposition algorithm is only known to deliver a dual optimal solution [6], [11], [14], [23] rather than the actual optimal transmit power spectra (i.e., primal optimal solution). Moreover, the existing analysis of these algorithms is quite unsatisfactory: the convergence of IWFA to a Nash equilibrium solution is established only when channels satisfy certain restrictive diagonal dominance conditions [15], [22], [24], while the dual decomposition algorithm can fail to converge to a feasible spectrum sharing solution.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is the per-tone exhaustive search which still has exponential complexity in the number of users: O(B N ). In [13] [14] an iterative procedure is used to make this complexity linear. However, optimality cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Spectrum Management: On/off Power Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they rigorously established the zero-duality gap result of Yu and Lui for the continuous formulation when the interference channels are frequency selective. The asymptotic strong zero duality result of [19,20] suggests that the Lagrangian dual decomposition approach ( [4,17,29]) may be a viable way to reach approximate optimality for finely discretized spectrum management problems. In fact, when restricted to the FDMA policy, they showed that the Lagrangian dual relaxation, combined with a linear programming scheme, could generate an -optimal solution for the continuous formulation of the spectrum management problem in polynomial time for any fixed > 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the optimization perspective, the problem solution can be formulated either as a noncooperative Nash game ( [7,28,25,18]); or as a cooperative utility maximization problem ( [3,30]). Several algorithms were proposed to compute a Nash equilibrium solution (Iterative Waterfilling method (IWFA) [7,28]); or globally optimal power allocations (Dual decomposition method ( [4,17,29]) for the cooperative game. Due to the problems nonconvex nature, these algorithms either lack global convergence or may converge to a poor spectrum sharing strategy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%